you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ClassroomPast6178 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Title IX meant US universities had to offer sports scholarships to women and soccer was one of the sports that they started handing out scholarships for. The USNWT can’t beat a decent male youth team, but the money and training they did at university set them up to dominate in soccer where the rest of the world just didn’t have the training programmes. Now women’s football is being pushed by FIFA, and places like England are investing in the professional women’s game the dominance of the US Women’s National Team will start to slip.

The difference that investment in training makes can be seen in the radical difference between GB Olympic performance before and and after the changes to funding, they went from embarrassing failure in Barcelona and Sydney to sitting high on the medals table in London, Beijing etc.

Proper investment in training makes a huge difference, and that was what gave the USNWT their edge.

[–]LyingSpirit472 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

While you're right the USWNT had proper investment in training, why did US universities start with soccer scholarships? Because youth soccer being co-ed since it became a thing in the US meant it was one of the first sports there was a large enough amount of women who were good players to field teams...and more specifically, it's one of only three team sports that have a lot of women who are good at it [and investing in team sports are very necessary because they're the only real way to make enough of a dent to cover the American football team...and most colleges would cut academics before they cut their excuse for alumni to come back to the school to get drunk on a Saturday and pretend they're still college kids into their 70s.]

Youth soccer being co-ed from an early age IS a big part of it where it just ISN'T in England or overseas. You can invest in women's football NOW, sure, but there's nothing that's going to match up with "when you're kids, you're just not inviting the girls onto the pitch with you, because even just kicking around the ball with your friends could be enough to get a scout for your neighborhood's soccer academy to sign you right there and have a chance to go pro, and having some girls out there could make them not know you're good enough for it" (another difference the US has over European football, since the US has the draft system for their pro leagues including MLS; only MLB teams in Latin America are able to do the "sign any player who looked good in a sandlot game and if even one of them becomes a star, you profit" method European teams do.) Again, men will just get bigger and stronger in puberty, so inevitably the women will fall behind...but it's that time BEFORE that happens when they're kids that you can make girls become really good at the sport first.