I could relate this thinking to how homosexuals rape /molest young boys at a freequency far outpacing heterosexuals who rape young girls. Do more girls get molested by heterosexual men? Yes, of course, because the pop. per cap is much greater than that of the homosexual population. However, homosexuals comprising only 3-4% of the total US population rape boys at a frequency extroadinarily greater and with multiple repeated offenses than the heterosexual pop. It would take over 80,000,000 of the heterosexual population to rape the same nmber of young girls as it does for 4,000,000 of the homosexual pop. to rape the same number of young boys.

BUT WAIT!!! I know homosexuals (Jews) and they are really nice, good people you might say. And I agree, they are; the majority are. However, in the homosexual (Jewish) community there is a subset population, very small in size, that rapes (controls the media [5 of 6 television news corps. owned by zionist Jews, the 6 a so called jewified, zionist gentile] conduct false flags like 9/11, extracts and leaches on the American people, indebts economies, basically rapes countries) and molests boys at an unprecedented level. And because of this the majority of nice homosexuals (Jews) think you are a homophobe (antisemite) for mentioning these facts (even, sometimes the very people involved), or that you may have generalized all homosexuals (jews) with the actions of a few thousand dangeros homosexual (Jewish) criminals. Think the Zionist, and internationalist Jews; and even in those groups the majority, although holding a warped ideology are law abiding. Think the Jewish mob. There's a great book about the internationalist Jewish mob, something JFK and RFK wanted to rid of, as did they Israel's nuclear program and making AIPAC a foreign agent. Anyway, the book was banned in France, the author arrested and jailed 13 times for writing it. How nice.

Basically, what I'm trying to say is it is okay to generalize. When I talk about the crusades I say the Christian crusaders, Catholic crusaders, etc., obviously, not all christians nor catholics supported the crusades. Is this retoric antichrist?

I think it's important to name the people involved in what ever matter you write about. If they are all Jews, then you're allowed to mention this fact. If some are, that's fine too. As long as your not advocating genocide or threating someone or an ethnic group with violence than who really cares.

Not to mention most Jews are not semitic. And palestinians are semitic in origin, so are Zionist Jews antisemitic?