Anti-Semetic Posts

submitted by Work2Death from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HeyImSancho 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Don't be as quick to place people into flawed categories as I am. Most of your assumptions about my beliefs are wrong, as I'm sure are my assumptions about others' beliefs.

I don't really have assumptions as such. I've noted a few people on the board, who tend to, 'innocently' steer directives back towards the same direction that the large social media groups, as well as the MSM are trying to steer people..... Yet, it's perfectly innocent, and organic... Spew lol

An easy example of this broad sweeping crap, would be the plight for 'no antisemitism' on the board..... But, the term, 'antisemitism' by modern standards is only towards "Jews", but is a Jew a religious affiliation, or a racial Semitic group? They play both cards at different times, and usually distinctly separate; most funny of all, the Ashkenazi are Europeans; I mean have you seen the Israeli Knesset lately? If Hitler is exactly how the victors wrote in history, then he'd be laughing, and smiling at the color of Israel.

Yet another aspect of 'antisemitism', directly back to the "Semitic" race angle, the Arabs, and brown people of the area are truly Semitic; I guess since European Jews have trademarked that though, the brown people are only 'slightly Semitic', and second class, when talking Semites, huh?(actually by MSM standards, to note the arabs are Semitic is somehow antisemitism, strange, no?)

The fact is, the world is run by assholes; who own the game, and have the rest of us chasing our tales. They're not Capitalists, Fascists, Socialists, nor Communists; they're slave masters running their traditional games of divide, and conquer. They keep us always guessing our individual rights, and our individual identities, WHY? Just like the military, they need to destroy individualism, and rebuild us into 'citizens', aka slaves; the ones in power are the slavers, and always have been. And yes, not all, but a great deal percentage wise have been, and are Jewish.

Is it wrong to note a trend? <<<----if anything of my post is answered, this is the question I would favor.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed Sancho. Awesome comment! No it's not wrong to note a trend.

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Is it wrong to note a trend?

By pointing out this "trend" – which might not even be one; analysis of the selection biases involved is interesting but iirc hasn't been done for this yet – you're furthering that "divide and conquer" approach.

[–]HeyImSancho 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

By choosing to at least entertain information, I'm furthering 'divide, and conquer'? Whizz, that's silly, and on par with the govt. status quo; which usually dictates that no one is intelligent enough not to have a nanny; nanny state.

As long as my breath flows, there won't be a topic I won't discuss; that's freedom, and it must be exercised. Stupid people, will always be stupid, and do subsequent stupid stuff; people who can control themselves; why should they self limit when fate obviously rules the day?

[–]wizzwizz4 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Everything you say has a consequence. I don't think through everything I say, but I have pre-prepared rules that – if followed – limit my "frivolous speech" to stuff that likely won't have lasting negative impacts. I re-evaluate these aperiodically.

If you're not going to limit yourself to such rules, please consider considering the consequences of everything you say to a large audience. You could adversely affect your ability to achieve your goals, otherwise.

[–]HeyImSancho 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh Wizz, don't you comprehend? You can never silence, or quell anyone's ability to speak their mind.

Take whatever rules you think you're showing people, they'll be twisted, and exploited, until discarded. The establishment is also trying to get people to obey some sort of command protocol in regards to what can be said, or not said; yet it's lacking. The organic rules of the natural world, which do trump all, dictate you cannot control all things.

I mean go for it, but at the end of eternity, everything that could be said, will have been said. Life's not about being afraid of offending others, it's about living, and knowing that what others have to say, don't have to impact you; 'water off a duck's back'.

Weaklings unfit for life are who need safe places; I don't say that lightly, but through my years have seen it play out; just my experience I guess.