Remember to open-mindedly comment on subs with differing narratives!

submitted by happysmash27 from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Zombi 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

I agree 100%. I actually JUST posted in a conspiracy thread. I myself am very skeptical of conspiracies and I find myself very opposed to most of them (mostly due to logical flaws and giving speculation waaaay too much merit). One fear I had while making the post was the possibility for being banned. I will most likely make more contrarian posts on that sub and my fear is that I will be seen as "An MSM shill" and thus banned from posting. It's the most worrying with conspiracy theorists as they tend to easily shut out and completely disregard anyone who agrees with any kind of MSM narrative, no matter how justified/backed up it is.

I hope we can all just realize we're all people with our own lives. We all are just trying to speak our minds and converse. We aren't some stereotype or some strawman. People rarely do things in malice and on the contrary most people disagree because they think what they believe will be best for other people and themselves; they just have different routes towards the same goal.

I hope we can all understand those simple facts and learn from each other. I hope others have the critical thinking the prove when they are right and the strength to admit when they are wrong.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

What was your conspiracy post?

If you ever want some insight on conspiracies give me a shout. I'll give my honest take on it and don't mind explaining it to newbies. Everyone didn't know stuff until they learned about it. And SOOOOO much they won't teach in school, intentionally. "They" want a good worker class distracted by trivial television, not an educated mass that realize how shafted we all are rise up and establish a fair system.

[–]Zombi 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

https://saidit.net/s/DepopulationWatch/comments/ig6/due_to_health_concerns_brussels_stops_5g/w2j

For context we were talking about whether 5G is bad for you and the environment. I'm making the case that we don't really know and not knowing doesn't mean it's going to cause mass genocide like this user is saying.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think one of the greatest problems with the 5G thing is that we don't know because they WON'T do the proper testing, like with vaccines, and that automatically raises a LOT of red flags.

How can we say yes if we don't know and they won't let us know?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is the real question. Great point.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Can you think of a legit reason to deploy 5G on a global scale; without evaluating the risks, or asking for input from the public?

[–]Zombi 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Faster data speeds, really. As far as evaluating the risks goes, I completely agree testing must be done. If you read my post my issue is with needless speculation and fear mongering, not whether the technology should be tested before implementation.

Public opinion can be a tricky thing. Like I said in my post, people jump to conclusions and spout conspiracies with little to no actual evidence. I feel the public should be informed, but sometimes the public has no fucking clue what they're talking about as well.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

My question has nothing to do with data transfer rates.

Can you think of a legit reason to avoid testing, and avoid providing testing methods and test results to the public?
Note: Any reasonable answer should include some theorized rationale, which could justify avoiding safety testing.

[–]Zombi 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No I cannot which is why I've said repeatedly that testing is certainly something we should do. Who knows why they don't want to test it, it could be for some mundane reason or it could be to cover something up, my point is that we do not know yet here people are acting as if they do.

[–]cyber_burn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

i don't know the answer to this and it's too late for me to go down a research hole, but did they do this kind of safety testing for telephone lines, internet lines, 4G, etc?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don’t Hold Your iPhone Too Close to Your Head, Apple Says So.

Most (all) cell phone manuals indicate that you shouldn't hold your phone next to your head.

[–]SundogsPlace 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Can you think of a legit reason to deploy 5G on a global scale; without evaluating the risks

They never publically evaluate the risks when they know there are risks to be found.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's it man, straight out of the Monsanto playbook. If they refuse to do studies, they can say we have no evidence that X happens.