Remember to open-mindedly comment on subs with differing narratives!

submitted by happysmash27 from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Zombi 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (10 children)

https://saidit.net/s/DepopulationWatch/comments/ig6/due_to_health_concerns_brussels_stops_5g/w2j

For context we were talking about whether 5G is bad for you and the environment. I'm making the case that we don't really know and not knowing doesn't mean it's going to cause mass genocide like this user is saying.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think one of the greatest problems with the 5G thing is that we don't know because they WON'T do the proper testing, like with vaccines, and that automatically raises a LOT of red flags.

How can we say yes if we don't know and they won't let us know?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is the real question. Great point.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Can you think of a legit reason to deploy 5G on a global scale; without evaluating the risks, or asking for input from the public?

[–]Zombi 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Faster data speeds, really. As far as evaluating the risks goes, I completely agree testing must be done. If you read my post my issue is with needless speculation and fear mongering, not whether the technology should be tested before implementation.

Public opinion can be a tricky thing. Like I said in my post, people jump to conclusions and spout conspiracies with little to no actual evidence. I feel the public should be informed, but sometimes the public has no fucking clue what they're talking about as well.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

My question has nothing to do with data transfer rates.

Can you think of a legit reason to avoid testing, and avoid providing testing methods and test results to the public?
Note: Any reasonable answer should include some theorized rationale, which could justify avoiding safety testing.

[–]Zombi 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No I cannot which is why I've said repeatedly that testing is certainly something we should do. Who knows why they don't want to test it, it could be for some mundane reason or it could be to cover something up, my point is that we do not know yet here people are acting as if they do.

[–]cyber_burn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

i don't know the answer to this and it's too late for me to go down a research hole, but did they do this kind of safety testing for telephone lines, internet lines, 4G, etc?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Don’t Hold Your iPhone Too Close to Your Head, Apple Says So.

Most (all) cell phone manuals indicate that you shouldn't hold your phone next to your head.

[–]SundogsPlace 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Can you think of a legit reason to deploy 5G on a global scale; without evaluating the risks

They never publically evaluate the risks when they know there are risks to be found.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's it man, straight out of the Monsanto playbook. If they refuse to do studies, they can say we have no evidence that X happens.