@magnora7 - Any update on crowdsourcing the spam battle?

submitted by hfxB0oyA from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]neolib 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

It would be cool if we could vote for posts being "spam": if difference between "this is spam" votes and "this is not spam" votes from established users > 5 then "remove as spam".

[–]GuyWhite 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Not good. Some commie libs would join and conspire against any non-woke posts. Gotta watch out for tyranny by the majority.

[–]neolib 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Well in case some post which is obviously not spam was upvoted as spam, users which upvoted it should lose spam-voting privileges, also there should be a high karma minimum to prevent easy brigading by new accounts.

[–]hfxB0oyA[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I asked about something like this a year or so ago, and the reply from Vulptex was that the site has those sorts of tools, but mag7 is loathe to turn them on, let alone allow new patches to be uploaded.

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

this guywhite fucks

[–]GuyWhite 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Amen.

[–]xoenix 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's report and block already. I dunno how often admins look at the reports but if I were an admin that would be the first place I'd look to clean up spam.