you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]dipshit 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

Posts like this "drag down" Saidit's engagement.

/u/username saved the Chat #subscribed channel from constant spamming by Ed and from your constant bans of users. You and others were helping Ed fuck up that Chat channel. For you and others it was a type of computer game where you could enjoy your power trips. /u/Smokedrugs also saved the chat by reducing the reset times to 6 hours each. There are still crazy people who occasionally dominate the chat with their schizo bullshit, and you and others continue to post whatever you want. There are absolutely no restrictions on you (other than on your spamming).

Usher's improvement of the chat - making sure that normal users cannot be banned and that spam can be restricted - revived an important part of Saidit: a place for casual, random discussions about anything. Sometimes we discuss physics, or food, or politics, or anything else. It's become a place where everyone is welcome. Your "contributions" recently and comments by one other user are only attacks against normal users. You are actively trying to annoy people, insult them, push them away from the chat, and from Saidit. You constantly attack some of the most active and interesting users at Saidit, who reduce their activities on Saidit thereafter. This post of yours proves that you are still trying to control other people on Saidit, that you want to make Saiditors answer to you, that you want to be in control of the Chat and of what others can say at Saidit. It's TEXTBOOK NARCISSISM. Your constant approaches at Saidit have been to divide and manipulate. Why do you do this? You are projecting your personal problems onto others here at Saidit. Cut it out. It fucks up engagements at Saidit.

Selfishness is not the way forward for Saidit. Building relationships and dialogue with a broad range of users is the way forward. Try it.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (10 children)

Okay socks, who was banned for good reason.

[–][deleted]  (9 children)

[deleted]

    [–]JasonCarswell[S] 8 insightful - 6 fun8 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

    Says the alt-user-account of socks who was banned.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 7 fun5 insightful - 6 fun6 insightful - 7 fun -  (7 children)

    Thou shalt not take Lord Tucker's name in vain

    [–]dipshit 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

    Thou shalt torture Carlson to death, slowly, if I remember correctly. Many Saiditors have wanted socks to die a horrible death, but they weren't banned. Moreover, the US would be a much better place if Carlson croaked, ending the most popular misinformation propaganda resource for the 1% forces of evil of the past two decades.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 6 fun -  (5 children)

    socks will die of hyper-partisanship soon enough

    [–]dipshit 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

    Socks asks only for an appreciation of the center, of mediocrity, of non-radicalized representative politics for the 99%, so says my man Salieri

    [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (3 children)

    Responding with three different user names in a thread is a bit fucked, socks.

    [–]dipshit 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (2 children)

    2, dingleberry, not 3

    Think of it this way: everytime someone is banned, they splt into 2 users, then 4, then 8, then 16, and so on

    I'm currently at two, awaiting the next ban

    [–]Zapped 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    Every time a user is banned, a hand gets its sock.