you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (21 children)

the classic- calling people shills without an argument

[–]jet199 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

That's his paranoia kicking in.

Him and Chippy likely accused each other of being everything over the last couple of months.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

He didn't get along with Chippy either? Dude seems like a shill to me too, but my argument is he knows Chinese and the vast majority of his articles, entertaining as they are, are negative towards the US. Classic 50 cent army.

He also doesn't seem to understand humor, like maybe English wasn't his native language to be able to understand nuance, and some of his replies seem like they follow a script.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I don't doubt anything around here. But we do act on the easy ad hominem reports to keep the m7 pyramid rolling.

oops fuck wrong thread

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (17 children)

calling people shills

Now you're making stuff up like socks.

Edit: Unless you mean that's what Pooper was doing.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (16 children)

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

Dude, I think Popper is right tho. https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/8vf1/popper_is_gone/wufi

Guy kinda reminds me of AmericansScream bot.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (13 children)

I don't doubt anything around here. But we do act on the easy ad hominem reports to keep the m7 pyramid rolling.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

I was just looking at the rules and maybe I smoked too much weed and am totally missing it, but uh... There's no rule about what level of the pyramid is okay, just about dragging it down.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (10 children)

ok fine. black pill time. the rules are intentionally subjective.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

Didn't there used to be more rules though, like no advocating violence? I felt like that was once a written rule.

I am a big fan of free speech. What if, because you don't like moderating, and I don't like moderating, we just kinda ignore everything that isn't illegal?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

Hmm I feel like it was written too, but I can't find it. Maybe it was just m7 convention and in random m7 comments.

I am a big fan of free speech. What if, because you don't like moderating, and I don't like moderating, we just kinda ignore everything that isn't illegal?

That's not the saidit way that I agreed to uphold. But personally, let's fucking do it man. Put your name on the hosting and it's live tomorrow.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Put your name on the hosting and it's live tomorrow.

Hah, does my name seem like Patsy to you?

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The very bottom of the Pyramid is obviously forbidden advocating violence, above that is heavily frowned upon name-calling, etc etc etc, upwards getting less bitchy and more civilly embraced.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The very bottom of the Pyramid is obviously forbidden advocating violence, above that is heavily frowned upon name-calling, etc etc etc, upwards getting less bitchy and more civilly embraced.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I could have sworn that was explicitly stated but I wasn't seeing it. A new user wouldn't see anything saying the bottom of the pyramid is forbidden.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

pyramid rolling.

Beautifully clunky.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I misread too hastily - and added an edit. Sorry. Thanks for the link.