SaidIt is back online!

submitted by [deleted] from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]hfxB0oyA 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Hooray, thanks folks!

I retract what I previously said about allowing the iron right guy to remain because it's better to allow his bullshit to stand and denigrate him for it. He's shown he's just another moron who wants to ban those with whom he disagrees, so in this narrow case we need to strike against him with the ban hammer first and often.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yes, advocating violence is against SaidIt's rules, even though certain people think it should be allowed.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Remind me how you feel about pedos?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'd propose a bill to the Arkansas House of Representatives to make child molestation punishable by death in all cases, should I be elected to that body.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And I totally agree but how is that any different from joke comments.

Besides, sounds like it was just cc error that caused the site to be down. This is kinda moot now.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's different, because the hosting company won't shut us down for it.

Yeah, I'm pretty sure it was just a coincidence, at this point — but they did threaten to shut the whole sub down because of one sub a few months back.

[–]Chipit 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You can't grant freedom of speech to those who want to eliminate freedom of speech. I said ban them a long time ago, and then keep banning their alts when they pop back up. It's the only way.