I'm doing things differently from here on out.

submitted by [deleted] from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

you jsut threatened to ban someone for saying they like hitler, then used the 'can't advocate violence' rule as your excuse.

Stop gaslighting

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

No I didn't, that one-hundred percent a lie. I specifically said that he'd only be banned if he advocated violence, and expressly said he could say he likes Hitler.

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I will not ban you for saying that; I cannot speak for Magnora. I will, however, charge you for advocating violence if you do so, so be wary of that.

I will, however, charge you for advocating violence if you do so

I will not ban you for saying that; I will, however, charge you for advocating violence if you do so

So, you won't ban people for saying they like hitler, but will charge them for advocating violence ....

what I said.

unless you meant to say:

I will not ban you for saying that. I cannot speak for Magnora. however,if you advocate for violence, i'll ban you, so be wary of that. I have a huge virtual penis and like to wave it about to establish my dominance

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I have a huge virtual penis and like to wave it about to establish my dominance

lol

[–]AnarchySpeach 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Just to clarify, (because I need something others can copy/paste later if they have to)

  • Saying he did nothing wrong is allowed.

  • Saying what he did should be repeated is not.

Is that what you mean? Or am I misunderstanding?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, but the second point is only true for violence.

[–]AnarchySpeach 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah. Some people who support the first tend to disagree the second isn't the same thing and find it weird to think of them separately.

A few people are going to get really bent out of shape when their comment gets deleted over it. Good luck explaining it to them.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Some people who support the first tend to disagree the second isn't the same thing and find it weird to think of them separately.

You just have to be careful about how you word things. If the words don't advocate violence: he usually doesn't mind.

A few people are going to get really bent out of shape when their comment gets deleted over it.

They're already bent out of shape, and are looking for anything to whine about — for their narrative is not the furthering of free speech, but rather its destruction. You'll notice that many of the people complaining, such as Bob, are opposed to the Reform movement, and have repeatedly dragged discussion down the Pyramid of Debate. Odd that he never liked Hitler until now...

Good luck explaining it to them.

You can't get the bot to stop posting ads by explaining to it why their acts are wrong.