"Saidit will die like Voat" - an incel vouching for jailbait

submitted by [deleted] from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Making specific threats of violence is actually illegal and will result in this site being taken offline.

Yes but Caamib did not make a specific threat of violence. And your Pyramid of Debate rule simply doesn't apply here because Caamib's comment was an explanation that did not drag the discussion down. So you have absolutely no legitimate reason to ban Caamib.

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Yes and as I just explained, I define it a bit more broadly to "advocating violence" (calling for the physical injury or death of another person or group of people) for the purposes of saidit.

[–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Maybe you do, but simply "advocating violence" (your definition) doesn't violate your rules. Your rules prohibit "repeatedly dragging discussion in a downward direction on the Pyramid of Debate". Did Caamib do this? No.

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Your rules prohibit "repeatedly dragging discussion in a downward direction on the Pyramid of Debate"

Yes, and the bottom level of that pyramid is advocating violence! https://saidit.net/static/PyramidDebate.jpg

So by advocating violence he is dragging it to the bottom level.

[–]fschmidt 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

But he didn't do it repeatedly.

And now that I look at your own definition in this thread "calling for the physical injury or death of another person or group of people" he didn't actually do this. He just said that he personally supports violence but he didn't call for anyone to do anything.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He obviously broke the rules by advocating mass murder, so he's banned. End of story. Have a good evening.

[–]fediverseshill 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Damn, I guess this joker would ban our WWII heroes then 👌👌