Petition for mods of major subs to ban /user/fuzzbutt22 for censorship on /s/PinkPillFeminism

submitted by SuperConductiveRabbi from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]teelo 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (131 children)

They also werent hurting anyone. Harden the fuck up.

[–]radfem 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (130 children)

I’m not the one whining for people to be banned because I wasn’t allowed to tool around.

Ps. You know psychological studies suggest that people with the least empathy for the emotional health and wellbeing of others ‘just harden up sunshine!’ Are actually the most likely to be poorly able or completely incapable of managing their own emotions and often expect others to overly accomodate their feelings. Just saying.

[–]teelo 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (129 children)

I’m not the one whining for people to be banned because I wasn’t allowed to tool around.

Neither am I. I would prefer you have your moderation abilities removed so that you're forced to listen to counter-opinions. Safe-spaces do not belong here.

Ps. You know that psychology isn't a real science?

[–]radfem 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (128 children)

Lol

I’m so concerned that geniuses like you are not on my side of this debate.

Jesus, man... guys of your quality are so hard to find.

Ps dude, I’m literally not a mod on here, is literally you have no idea what you’re even talking about.

Seriously really disappointed someone of your intelligence is not on my side.

[–]teelo 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (127 children)

If you're not even a mod here then why are you defending them?

Ps: keep complaining about the patriarchy. Your complaints do nothing but keep you busy while us men continue to enjoy the money and power we get for simply having a penis. Sucks to be you!

[–]radfem 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (126 children)

Imagine being at the top of the privilege ladder and still being so bitter and scared that you have to mock women for trying to defend their right to speak uninterrupted by men...

I’d say get some therapy but... well... you clearly aren’t confident enough to work on your massive personal deficiencies.

Ps. Because it’s the morally right thing to do... strange concept for someone like you I know but...

Pps. If my complaints are such a time waste why do they bother you so much?

[–]teelo 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (26 children)

Imagine being at the top of the privilege ladder

Imagine being so brainwashed you actually think all men are at the top of the privilege ladder. Imagine being so braindamaged you can't even recognise obvious satire (which is about 99% of my comments).

[–]radfem 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (25 children)

Sure...

I get it bro, it’s hard to actually seriously argue a point (especially when losing) better to just claim it’s all a big joke.

I’d say it must be nice to be able to be so lazy... but honestly I’d rather be stressed than be the self involved douche you clearly are.

[–]teelo 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (24 children)

I'm hardly losing the argument. You're not even arguing. You're just making personal attacks.

If the world is "dominated by the Patriarchy", then explain to me:

  1. Why do Family Courts favour giving mothers the child in the majority of cases?

  2. Why do Family Courts favour awarding large amounts of alimony to the ex-wife in the vast majority of cases?

  3. Why are Police trained to always arrest the man in a domestic violence dispute, even if the woman is the only one displaying any violence, and even if the man is the accuser?

  4. Why has the pay gap been proven to be perfectly equal between genders in western countries when the same job is compared?

  5. Why did 19 of the top 20 richest women in the world get their money from ex-husbands or an inheritance rather than earning it themselves through hard work?

The answer to all of these is simple: There is no "Patriarchy problem" outside of Saudi Arabia. Its all in your head. You need something to complain about. Women are not legally or socially inferior, the majority of you are just plain lazy, you want everything to be handed to you for free while men do all the hard work.

[–]Catbug 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Why do Family Courts favour giving mothers the child in the majority of cases?

Because of the assumption that women are inherently nurturing, know how to care for a baby, and want to raise children. The patriarchal idea of what a woman is.

Why do Family Courts favour awarding large amounts of alimony to the ex-wife in the vast majority of cases?

Old Fashioned idea stemming from women marrying and being a stay at home wife or mother provided for by a husband. She has no job history or training and no financial support if she leaves her husband. Needs reassessing as a policy.

Why are Police trained to always arrest the man in a domestic violence dispute, even if the woman is the only one displaying any violence, and even if the man is the accuser?

Because the vast majority of the time it is a man who’s the attacker and there’s been a few too many cases of police removing nobody and the victim being murdered.

Why has the pay gap been proven to be perfectly equal between genders in western countries when the same job is compared?

We devalue jobs once they are filled by a large number of women.

Why did 19 of the top 20 richest women in the world get their money from ex-husbands or an inheritance rather than earning it themselves through hard work?

Let’s not pretend all the richest dudes out there aren’t also Saudi princes who never earned a cent lol. That’s just a strawman.

[–]radfem 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

I’m sorry but we were arguing about whether or not males should be allowed to troll feminist subs and whether it’s hypocritical for a person to cry censorship and then ask that others be banned...

I’m not here to derail the debate by discussing an entirely different topic (in detail).

If you’d like to make a post about how you think the patriarchy is myth because you’re completely uneducated feel free to do so in an appropriate sub.

Maybe I’ll stop by, but honestly I typically charge to educate people... men I charge double.

[–]teelo 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (98 children)

Ps. You didn't even respond to the question:

If you're not even a mod here then why are you defending them?

Remember the Pyramid of Debate on this site. Attack the core argument, not make personal attacks.

[–]radfem 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (97 children)

Ps. I did. Maybe try reading my whole comment instead of going off half cocked...

Pps. Aren’t you the guy who just argued that the pyramid of debate doesn’t matter so long as no one’s doing any harm...?

[–]teelo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (96 children)

You said:

Ps. Because it’s the morally right thing to do... strange concept for someone like you I know but...

Its morally right to defend a moderator who is violating freedom of expression?

Radical feminists used to be the ones arguing for freedom of expression, when right-wing leaders engaged in censorship against you. What happened to all those protests you fought for, for years, to get your views accepted? Why are you not honouring the ancestors who came before you, in your very same movement?

[–]radfem 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (95 children)

Saidit rules state that content that is not on topic or not made in good faith can be removed.

Please explain how someone admitting to posting provocative content just to test if they’d get banned is ‘in good faith’. Explain how ‘suck my dick’ isn’t low quality content that’s off topic.

Don’t sweat though, the op couldn’t defend himself either.