GenderCritical sub still showing up on /s/all New. Is that intended behavior?

submitted by rdh2121 from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]rdh2121[S] 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

It's not "being changed". Saidit's rules specifically disallow it. I'm arguing that the rules already in place should hold for /s/all New as well.

They're not allowed because their censorship is antithetical to the anti-censorship community we're trying to build here. The trade-off is that you can have your echo chamber, but you're not allowed to advertise it on /s/all.

[–]send_nasty_stuff 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Saidit's rules specifically disallow it.

Your personal interpretation of saidit's rule disallow it.

The trade-off is that you can have your echo chamber, but you're not allowed to advertise it on /s/all.

Showing up in the s/all feed is not a saidit endorsement or advertisement. It's just a feed. In fact your encouraging saidit to pick and choose who shows up in a feed which is a form of censorship. You're the one being censorious.

[–]rdh2121[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Your personal interpretation of saidit's rule disallow it.

No... the admins disallow it, which is why GC isn't on /s/all.

In fact your encouraging saidit to pick and choose who shows up in a feed which is a form of censorship. You're the one being censorious.

All you gotta do to be on /s/all is not censor your sub. That's literally it. You're clearly on the wrong site here. I recommend Reddit for all your censorship needs.

[–]basedaf 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They had a top post today or yesterday showing a tweet to a company saying how disgusting it is they advertise on reddit which promotes porn, and a header "this is how we get shit done" I'll support allowing them to be here, but let's not pretend we're on the same team. They're using a freedom of speech sanctuary to promote tactics to get reddit of all sites to censor, but simutaneously are complaining reddit censored them.

[–]basedaf 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

no see reddit censors but not specifically the content she wants censored, in fact she's the one being censored. How does she retaliate? Goes to a freedom of speech sanct and encourages censorship she herself approves of.