you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Deadly ideas huh?

... What is a deadly idea that a trans person might teach children more than a cis person would?

degeneracy huh?

... Awkward metaphor: What's degenerate about a gun?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

... What is a deadly idea that a trans person might teach children more than a cis person would?

How about never reproducing because you hacked off your dick

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are plenty of kids who need out of foster care. We don't need an overpopulation problem like China, nor do we need that giving Bill Gates and the WEF an excuse to practice eugenics.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

If you were bigotted by your ignorance and fear you might think that transexuality might be catching, like a virus.

But we're not that stupid are we?

Nor are drag queens transexuals, generally.

But I think that you're exaggerating to claim that not reproducing is deadly. You might be a bit lonelier in your later years, but not necessarily.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Social Contagions are real

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

You should provide some evidence if you think transsexualism is contagious.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You wish i'd sit here and argue about trannies all day. Nice try unit 8200.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I'm equally happy if you can provide evidence, or, as you have done, admit that you have none.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You lose, it's called transgenderism, not transsexualism.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Your bible says you are antiquated

It is considered an antiquated term, and is sometimes pejorative. The general shift is to instead use the term transgender or the abbreviated form trans, but due to its historical usage, transsexual remains in the modern vernacular.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transsexual

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Transgenderism most definitely is. It's the latest trend, if I was in middle school now I could totally see myself getting swept up in it. People like to do what is trendy, and people also do not understand gender so they think it just means acting more typical of a crtain gender.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Transgenderism most definitely is.

You should provide some evidence if you think "it most definitely is".

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You can't prove everything with numbers, that's not how this works. This is social science and psychology. Look at the absurd rate of trans kids, and how 80% of them detransition. They are all the "trendy" types. You can't concretely prove that but it should be pretty damn obvious.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If your evidence doesn't include numbers, link to it anyway.

Look at the absurd rate of trans kids, and how 80% of them detransition.

Not even close. About 1 or 2% https://www.gendergp.com/detransition-facts/

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How am I supposed to link to something that doesn't have numbers?