you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]whereswhat 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Wow. Do you seriously think this was acceptable behavior?

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Not at all what I said or even implied. I am just pointing out what is being deceitfully hidden to create a false sense of what happened. If you denounce this act on ignorant grounds you are worse than someone who stays silent because you devalue the legitimate criticisms. You are easily proven wrong and sully everyone else who speaks out by association. Make your arguments on solid grounds. Don't ever take people revealing the truth as your enemies even when the truth is not something that supports your stance.

[–]whereswhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Thanks for the clarification, I am glad to hear that. Still not sure what you are trying to get at with your comment though. Are you saying we need a new law to charge a police officer who has "consentual" sex with someone they are detaining?

Also, wtf am I "proven wrong" on? I didn't even claim anything...

[–]Canbot 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think it should be prohibited to have sex on the job, as it is with every job. And if someone is in custody, that should be considered statutory rape as they are by default being coerced. Even consensual sex to get out of a ticket should be considered rape.

[–]whereswhat 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I could not agree more.

Please forgive my ignorance on this: surely we already have laws on the books to prevent any type of sex with someone whilst they are detained, right?