Russia’s Army Is Running Out Of Ammunition (based on estimates from 2005)

submitted by iamonlyoneman from oilprice.com

all 10 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Bigs 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (7 children)

Nah, unlike the West the Russians have maintained their industrial base. They can and will simply create as much ammo as they need, without breaking into a sweat.

It's actually the US that is running low on armaments, having already sent all spare stuff and now digging deep into its own reserves:

https://www.csis.org/analysis/will-united-states-run-out-javelins-russia-runs-out-tanks

It will take years to replenish those stocks.

[–]SoCo 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

We've definitely recklessly drained our Strategic Oil Reserve, meant to keep us fueled and functioning in the event of a war.

[–]Zapped 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It was strategically used to help with the mid-term elections.

[–]Evola 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Same thing. The establishment is at war with the people.

[–]Zapped 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's not only ammunition, but equipment, too. There has been an issue with quality of artillery pieces, including barrels. Also, barrels have a limited lifespan (usually around 10,000 rounds) before they need to be reworked or replaced. As far as industrial capability goes, even the US could only produce around 20 M1 Abrams tanks per month if it had to ramp up production. I'm not sure about artillery, though.

[–]Bigs 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah, I read an article awhile ago that they have simply run out of ammo for the longer range artillery, and so now supplying smaller-caliber, closer-range stuff that can't get close to what the Russians are using. They can have countless units and ammo but it's hopeless against those who can simply shoot you from further away.

Edit: and regarding tanks, the M1 is incredibly complex, whereas the Russians tend towards more simple, faster-produced systems. The M1 is a great tank but like all USA systems it's built to make obscene profits before all other considerations.

[–]Zapped 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

U.S. equipment is more complex and therefore slower and more expensive to build, but that also helps mitigate loses in the field. Simpler technology should make it easier to repair in the field, but we're seeing so many abandoned by Russia during this war. That says a lot about logistics and supply chain.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

USA, according to my information, can make IIRC 20k shells a year. They're ramping up to double it. Russia can make double it in a month already. USA is behind the power curve, big time, compared even to Russia now. Not to mention, China.

But. USA can also ramp up in a bigass hurry when needed.

The barrels are wearing out in the Ukraine because holhols are (to be charitable) not using the weapons properly and they are overheating them from overuse.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

just any day now, trust me bro

[–]JewsAreOfColor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The US ran out of bombs even before Trump became president.