you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jostiniane 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Is a Harvard professor a baloney too? (Andrew Huberman)

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Doesn't mean shit.
Professors everywhere are pushing critical baloney theories.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

"Experts", so to say, i agree.

Most printed paper has the value of toilet-paper anyways. It is the mostly "imprinted" memories of many human beings that "gives" it a value "beyond" what it actually is.

Because human beings don't trust each other "enough" anymore mostly, so to say.

"Because you can trust the ticks that steer the banks" is a mainstream belief, e.g. .

That is why they printed a "pseudo-solution" , a "proof-of-concept" - essentially most likely - on paper.

Then they imprint the "pseudo-memory" that it "should have" more value than it actually has into the humans memory deeper, so to say, they give it to, even more than it already is.

This is osmium-grade bullshit, if you want to listen to one of my "views" on this...

That is why this traditional belief (that is a "quite obvious" fallacy anyways) is so hard to permantently shredder from a mean 80mb-hard-drive of a "standard" "Homer-Simpson"- pseudo-"brain" running Windows 3.1, so to say.

Things like these are what my gods are joking about when they are talking about human beings again and again.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You were hitting strong for a while, then were hit or miss. Glad to see you here hit it out of the park.

[–]jagworms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know what this guy thinks, but if he says humans don't use pheromones, he's wrong.

Thanks for this fallacious appeal to authority. His tenure is meaningless.