you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (40 children)

I think you should leave that whole thing in the past.

Dingo does have very similar views to you. I didn't have to argue for you, we would have had a replacement if I had just been more patient. ;)

[–][deleted]  (33 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

    Oh, they are your alts?

    [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

    See dude, no real consequences, no real changing. The punishment is losing your account and having to start all over. This 2 week thing did nothing.

    /u/AXXA

    [–]grassfed 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

    🙏

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (9 children)

    Drama Queen tries to take credit.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

    Credit? You see anyone happy about this?

    [–]JasonCarswell 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (4 children)

    Because you bitched, the authoritarian shill and misinfo agent socks is allowed back, despite ban evasions.

    IMO they should be perpetually banned.

    Fuck socks. Proper fucked.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    Fuck yes and I'd do it again

    https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/8roe/why_are_so_many_comments_hidden_under_posts/

    Every so often someone bitches that because they blocked someone they can't see all the conversations the blocked person generates.

    I'm sure I don't need to spell it out for you. Banning them doesn't fix that, it just removes the convo for everyone. And if nobody wanted to see it they wouldn't care about all the missing comments. Logical incongruity.

    [–]JasonCarswell 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

    Blocking and banning are very different.

    The block function is incomplete.

    Banning should be reserved for bad actors, like socks, bots, and spam.

    Banning doesn't remove the conversations for everyone.
    Self-deletion or admin-removal does.

    None of this is a reason to defend socks.

    [–]Airbus320 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    I am happy that socks is gone

    [–]Foidblaster9000 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Uh oh

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    😮

    I got some bad news for you then....

    [–][deleted]  (18 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (17 children)

      Welcome back. I see you've changed a lot on your time off.

      [–][deleted]  (16 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (15 children)

        Don't be sorry dude I don't give a fuck. I will be watching you for rule violations.

        [–][deleted]  (14 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted]  (13 children)

          [removed]

            [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

            If "shill" is name-calling, I'd say "fed" is name-calling too - but then calling a spade a spade is both name-calling and racist, while truth-seeking.

            Oi vey, I'm so confused and meshugana.

            [–][deleted]  (5 children)

            [deleted]

              [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

              You should post it. I turned off the chat a while ago because I never saw anyone on there.