you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

Whose the clown really. The one posting a meme or the negative IQ doing a fact check on it?

Btw you're coming right hot from the base of the pyramid you Reddit NPC without the mod or admin backup to come and rescue you...

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

First off, it's "Who's". When it's possessive you use "whose", when it's a concatenation (edit: contraction) of "who is", you use "who's".

With regards to the overall comment, this isn't quite Motte & Bailey but it's pretty close. You confirmed you were being serious with this line:

Btw...All other bulge photos scrubbed from Duck Duck Goy as well. Time to look for a different Engine me thinks.

Then when challenged you say "it's just a meme" and pretend like you weren't being serious.

It seems like you got bored before you finished reading the pyramid, otherwise you'd know what the top portion was: refutation of the central point. Michelle Obama isn't trans. Furthermore, people that think she is are just right-wing clowns. Sorry if you felt like you were entitled to a polite refutation, but the position that she is trans isn't defensible. It's up there with a retarded lazy leftist says "penises can be female" or "Trump is a fascist" or some shit like that.

[–]kokolokoNightcrawler 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Clearly again it's all about the censorship and hiding of satire, escaping from satire, critiquing satire...That won't work, it never did. Even the Chinese Commies are having hard time with that one.

refutation of the central point. Michelle Obama isn't trans. Furthermore, people that think she is are just right-wing clowns.

Jumping right off the capstone to an ad-hominem...Ok, lady, what ever you say....

[–]Zahn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Fedi is an example of the cognitive dissonance that affects low IQ people. It's astounding how they will desperately concoct crazy coincidence theories to protect their precious mal-adjusted view of the world so they don't have to come to terms with the world's harsh realities.

What did Joan Rivers mean by this?

Rivers said "You know Michelle is a tranny." When asked to confirm her eyebrow-raising statement, she said, "A transgender. We all know. It's okay."

Then her quickly ensuing suspicious death?

[–]FediNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, very suspicious when women in their 80s die. Rivers was an old lady that did a lot of drugs. I've heard people say "Michelle is a tranny" for years now and it's always the same dumb arguments:

1) She looks manly! 2) Look at this photo that looks like it could be a bulge.

Except plenty of women have features like that and none of the photos are convincing. Plus we have childhood photos and people that knew Michelle growing up. For fucks sake dude, learn what cognitive dissonance is.

[–]Zahn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

2 months after her statement about "Michelle" being a trans and Barry being gay, Joan had a routine surgery that ended in her death. It was ruled malpractice with the doctors and medical staff throwing a selfie party as she slowly gasped her last dying breath. The case was settled for millions and not to be talked about ever again. This was an expensive clinic for rich clients that she had gone to for years for this routine procedure, not some community health clinic.

Also, those pictures of "Michelle" as a kid are just images of a black female child. They do not provide definitive proof they are actually images of her.

Cognitive dissonance Fedi. Coincidence Theorist.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's wrong with being trans? You're acting like it's some kind of problematic behavior?

Why should we not mock and ridicule the powerful? The saying isn't afflict the afflicted, comfort the comfortable. In fact, you're punching down right now. You go! Defend the wealthy. Speak truth to the powerless!