you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

I'd agree but if you just look at the article the replacement terms are actually better.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

some are better, but too many options and too many variations could lead to even more chaos.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Excellent point, and I agree that some were better and some less gooder - however I don't think they were supposed to be universal replacements, rather be specifically utilized under specific cases. I'm guessing only a few might be more broadly embraced and the others will either fall into oblivion or be very specific.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

better

Please, the correct phrase is doubleplusgood. Do better doubleplusgood, comrade.