This copy-pasta

Oh, you think I copied this from someone else? Okay genius, find me where I copied this copy-pasta from.

attempt to refute medical science.

The sick thing is that vaxxists are the ones that are perverting and misusing actual medical science by pushing sub-standard vaccines that don't work and are dangerous.

• Anyone who knows anything about vaccination should have been suspicious from the moment the pharma companies started going on about "over 90% effective" against a virus that is so closely related to the original SARS virus where every single attempt to make a vaccine was a total and utter failure. But I expect you don't even know why the SARS vaccines failed.

• Anyone who knows anything about medical statistics would have been dismayed and disgusted by the way the pharma companies tried to pass off relative effectiveness when what we needed to know was absolute effectiveness -- but you probably don't even know that there is a difference.

• Anyone who knows anything about pharmaceuticals should have been horrified by the rushed and truncated testing -- never mind the Pfizer whistle-blower who reported outright fraud in the testing, or the way they unblinded the tests halfway through, or the way test subjects who suffered major adverse effects were just eliminated from their data.

• And even then, anyone who actually dug deep into their published results should have been shocked by the numbers of side-effects and poor effectiveness. (Although, if they were familiar with the pharmaceutical industry, not that shocked.) Even after massaging the data with a sledgehammer, Pfizer still couldn't make the vaccine look safe and effective -- so they just said it was, and people believed them.

• Pfizer is the most corrupt and dirty company in an industry dominated by corrupt and dirty players, companies that routinely pass off ineffective and harmful treatments as effective, and treat million dollar fines as a minor cost of doing business. And yet we are supposed to believe what they say.

• Anyone who knows anything about vaccination knew that mass vaccination in the middle of a pandemic could only drive the evolution of new strains of virus that were resistant to whatever limited protection the vaccine provided -- but was shouted down and cancelled until the evidence was indisputable that the vaccines were not effective against new strains.

• Anyone who knows anything about vaccination knew that vaccine enhanced disease was a risk -- but to this day the evidence for it is being ignored.

• Anyone who knows anything at all about the SARS-2 virus and its toxic spike protein should have shouted "Are you out of your freakin' minds???" to the suggestion we use mRNA technology to turn human cells into spike protein factories, making it impossible to control the dose or where the spike protein would be produced. We know know that some people are still producing spike protein over 400 days after they were last vaccinated, and that it can end up anywhere in the body. Pfizer's assurances that it would remain in the injection site were as false as their claim that the vaccine was "100% effective" at preventing infection.

• Anyone who knows anything at all about immunology would have know that the antibodies that bind to the spike protein will also bind to proteins in the heart, making myocarditis and pericarditis etc in vulnerable people almost guaranteed.

• Anyone who knows anything about intubation and the history of the first SARS virus was horrified at the way hospitals stuck people into ventilators at the first sign of Covid, and then counted the inevitable deaths as Covid deaths. And notice that Covid deaths from kidney failure have disappeared since doctors stopped routinely treating Covid patients with Remdesivir?

• Anyone who knows anything about epidemiology was suspicious at the ways medical authorities rigged the numbers:

  • routinely testing the unvaccinated for Covid, whether they were sick or not, while only testing the vaccinated if they were showing symptoms of Covid (undercounts Covid cases among the vaccinated);
  • using PCR test results as the only diagnostic for cases (overcounts Covid cases);
  • cranking up the PCR threshold to 40 or beyond (overcounts Covid cases);
  • counting Covid cases among the vaccinated as "unvaccinated" in the first two, or even three, weeks after vaccination (exaggerates the effectiveness of the vaccine);
  • counting the unvaccinated as "Covid deaths" if they test positive to the virus, even in cases when their death had nothing to do with Covid, while only counting the vaccinated if they actually died as a direct result of Covid (exaggerates the effectiveness of the vaccine).

In science, bias is inevitable, but it should go both ways and hopefully the biases cancel each other out somewhat. But during Covid, every single source of bias pushed in the same direction: exaggerating the risks of the virus, and exaggerating the benefits of the vaccine.

What peaked me was early in the process, when the Oxford team behind the Astrazeneca vaccine released their results of testing on animals, and I read the paper and saw that every single one of the vaccinated monkeys still got sick with Covid. I must have read dozens of articles, news stories and editorials about how great this was, and only one interviewed a scientist who pointed out that the Oxford results showed that the moneys still got sick -- and that was buried deep at the end of the article, where very few people would see it.

I also realised that, at a time when news reports were talking about how dangerous Covid was because it could infect and damage organs all over the body, the Oxford scientists made no effort to see whether there was any damage done to the monkeys' organs.

That's when I realised that the scientists involved, and the pharmaceutical companies, weren't interested in insuring that their vaccines actually worked -- they just wanted something "good enough" that they could sell as working to the gullible. And Astrazeneca is the most moral of them, they sold their vaccine at cost for the first two years, unlike Pfizer, Moderna and the others who made a killing on the product.