you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wristaction 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Here's something I wrote two years ago:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/dwby1b/politico_has_just_portrayed_a_5500word/

Politico has just portrayed a 5500-word investigatory piece they published in January 2017 as a "conspiracy theory", because it contains bad facts which undermine the establishment news media's Ukraine/Russia narrative.

To my eye, the moment has been marked from which the establishment media will become ever more brutal in it's propaganda. There have been flashes of nudity before; Such as when Dan Rather was given a second act in the Trump era to portray the legacy media's myths about its golden age when everyone knew to trust Journalism. But this is brazenly naked. It's whitelist-on-whitelist; One can't be certain a New York Times item is admissible because the New York Times may more recently have determined that the truth has changed.

If you're interested in the articles I'm talking about there, you'll want to read this recent Paul Sperry investigative piece which lays out in detail the timeline of Democrat-Ukraine shenanigans.

https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2022/03/10/how_ukraine_conspired_with_dems_against_trump_to_prevent_the_kind_of_war_happening_now_under_biden_820873.html