you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Cass 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Would not be ok if people were focusing on, say, burning homeless shelters and mom-and-pops.

Didn't they burn down low income housing?

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

[–]Tiwaking 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The articles writer is complete retarded and is why a legal process is in place: To stop idiot retards from being in charge of anything. If he had his way, Kyle Rittenhouse would be 100% guilty of everything charged

I have neither any legal expertise to bring to bear about the Kyle Rittenhouse case nor anything particularly novel to say about it. I think that, in a just world, Rittenhouse would be convicted both for a weapons possession charge and for reckless endangerment. As much as a part of me would like to see him go down for the actual killings, those charges seem to be vastly more complicated matters, especially given Wisconsin’s particular self-defense statutes. Certainly there should be some serious repercussions for carrying that weapon illegally and firing it in a way that endangered innocents. Otherwise I don’t know what the appropriate punishment would be, and my thoughts on Rittenhouse’s trial would inevitably be more about what sane and sound gun policy would look like rather than about his specific case.