you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jet199 26 insightful - 6 fun26 insightful - 5 fun27 insightful - 6 fun -  (69 children)

Aimee Challenor is a self proclaimed "little".

He literally larps as a child so adult men can pretend they are abusing a (large) child.

Anyone in a relationship with Aimee will be a paedo.

Aimee encourages and enables paedos. That's his main purpose in life after being groomed by his dad. That's the reason he went into politics and that's the reason he got a job with reddit.

Aimee even has a brother with exactly the same set of fetishes. It's no coincidence.

[–][deleted] 17 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 3 fun -  (68 children)

Aimee even has a brother with exactly the same set of fetishes. It's no coincidence

I didn't know that. What are the chances the father only groomed and raped the 3 children? Guy is in jail for 1, and his two kids were obviously abused. Sexual kinks don't really run in families normally.

And how many people did Aimee and her husband groom and rape?

I worry there's a whole lot of kids involved in this.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (67 children)

Not that I know much about this, but what I can see in the Spectator (https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-green-party-s-growing-contempt-for-women-s-rights) and on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aimee_Challenor) and in the recent Reddit activity is that there are serious, professional attacks against Aimee, at least some of which appear to be unfounded. The Specator is the Tory/alt-right announcement board for many, which is naturally attacking Aimee and the Green Party. It's what they do. Her Wikipedia page is obviously written by someone who wants to write mainly about her father, rather than about her, and is a remarkably professional direct attack on Aimee. If she's guilty of anything illegal, this should be addressed in a court of law. Perhaps she's a terrible person (I don't know), but the attacks on her are much more obvious, and show that there are some well-paid writers who are helping to remove her from politics, and if possible, from Reddit. As for Reddit mod policy, doxing should not be tolerated, so it seems /r/ukpolitics made the right decision.

[–][deleted] 24 insightful - 3 fun24 insightful - 2 fun25 insightful - 3 fun -  (66 children)

As for Reddit mod policy, doxing should not be tolerated, so it seems /r/ukpolitics made the right decision.

Nobody was doxxed though, a mod posted an article critical of the green party that mentioned Aimee but not reddit in any way, and he was banned by the admins but later restored.

professional attacks Perhaps she's a terrible person (I don't know

Her husband is a diaper wearing furry pedo. The third partner in their marriage is a diaper wearing furry pedo. She is a diaper wearing furry pedo. Her father is a diaper wearing pedo rapist kidnapper.

You see the massive red flag? This looks like a pattern of child abuse is being perpetuated. Now, if you're saying this is just a smear job, then I'd like to see the proof because the case for it is pretty convincing.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (65 children)

a mod posted an article critical of the green party that mentioned Aimee but not reddit

Perhaps the mod knew that Aimee was one of the subjects of the article and the comments on Reddit began to address Aimee's potential connection to Reddit, or as a mod. There is no evidence that she was was not outed/doxxed at Reddit, as we've seen no screenshots, and we're unlikely to see the comments that were deleted. But let's say none of this happened. Why therefore make the subreddit private? This is the reason they gave the next day:

Please do not name this individual, at all.

The only narrative we have is the one a Saiditor has given here, that the mod was banned and other decisions were made for Aimee.

Reddit indicates that she was doxxed. I see no evidence that she was not doxxed. (Perhaps someone could post this?)

Regarding 'diaper wearing furry pedos', are these bears that like to date children? (I've never heard this term, and not sure of the purpose of the diaper and fur. Remember the Eddie Murphy joke?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mFf5B5qEX4 )

[–]jet199 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (34 children)

"There is no evidence that she was was not"

There's a term for that.

It also translates to "there's no evidence she was"

Anyway, it's impossible to doxx a well known public figure with a well known username.

Even with address details if you're very involved in politics you can't be doxxed. Aimee Challenor ran for political office and registered their home address as their election office. His address is already public record.

They are just trying to kill the story with any excuse they can find.

Don't you feel dirty defending and distracting from paedophiles and their enablers just to troll people you look down on?

Or does the smug sense of self righteous virtue override any basic morality or human feelings?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (33 children)

OK - so she's famous enough to be harrassed and slandered without consequence.

I cannot find any evidence that she is a pedophile or has raped kids. Can you?

[–]GConly 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (19 children)

He.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

[–]GConly 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (17 children)

Still a man.

Always will be.

[–]jet199 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I've never stated he did.

Stay on topic.

You seem to be creating a poor victim narrative all on your own here and strawmanning everyone else to do it.

Have some basic self appreciation.

[–]emptiedriver 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

I cannot find any evidence that she is a pedophile or has raped kids. Can you?

His father was convicted of raping a 10 year old girl, and his husband has posted those tweets as well as fantasy stories about child sex, and Challenor has maintained good relations with both of them, defending them or erasing any mention of problems when possible. He has also self-identified as a "little" which basically means lover of pedophiles. He may have been a victim in the beginning since he started to become a public figure before he was probably of age, but he's an adult now and part of a community that considers this okay.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Thanks for this. I appreciate that all of this is problematic, and have responded to some of this elsewhere. Her husband's twitter was supposedly hacked, he said, even if his comments might have been relatively consistent with his personal views about fantasies about kids. This is a thought crime, I suppose, and if he wrote it, he's of course an asshole, with pedophile tendencies. I've not seen the 'little' comment or the definition. I will not defend Aimee's poor choices. I've tried to point out - from a legal standpoint (not personal) - that there is no evidence that she (and perhaps her husband) is definitely, without a doubt, a pedophile or has raped kids.

Did she try to manipulate or censor information about her father or herself? From a legal point of view (again, not personal), this can be problematic if she controls a public forum. Reddit, however, is a private company, and most of her fellow mods seemingly supported her at the company.

Did she enable her father and/or husband to enjoy rape or child porn. I don't know. I've not seen the evidence.

[–]NeedMoreCoffee 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

Most of his fellow mods are also TIM's and dodgy as fuck.

Like bardfinn a TIM who mods r/againsthatesubs a sub where users are known to make alt accounts and post hateful shit including child porn to get subs banned they deem unworthy of being on reddit.

Or drewdiepoodle a powermod TIM who has been caught luring kids to his house with the promise of drugs

https://www.reddit.com/r/MisterMetokur/comments/bgwsbu/how_reddit_powermods_are_unethically_grooming/

[–]emptiedriver 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Have you read the accounts provided by the Glinner update?

There are a lot of details about what he's specifically posted and what people that he's supported have specifically done. I don't know if he's been involved in any live-action abuse but I think it is pretty clear that he's been a consumer of child porn and comfortable having close relationships with people who have. Most likely he was the victim of that kind of thing himself and has just grown into a very sick minded individual. It's pretty sad but shouldn't result in pretending it's okay to allow him access to healthy kids.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (29 children)

Regarding 'diaper wearing furry pedos', are these bears that like to date children? (I've never heard this term, and not sure of the purpose of the diaper and fur. Remember the Eddie Murphy joke?:

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/aimee-challenor-ashton-lucas-david-challenor.47181/

https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/ashton-challenor-the-boy-who-disappeared

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

Thanks for these. Yes, her father is a monster. Just think of the lengths to which these writers are going to criticize her and her partner because of her father's actions. (And there is no evidence there of her as a pedophile or a rapist.)

[–][deleted] 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (20 children)

The husband has written erotic literature involving children and admitted to being a attracted to kids in a now deleted tweet. They're all into this very particular kink that's very much like Aimee's father was. Both of Aimee's partners are older. I have no doubt she was the victim but she's into the kind of stuff that made her a victim.

At the very least these are serious allegations that need to be addressed. People have had far worse happen to them just for tweeting the wrong thing.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Yes, though the partner claims his account was hacked (which is possible, when one considers the incredibly extensive attacks against these people). Sorry - thinking like a lawyer again - there is reasonable doubt for the the partner's Twitter case.

His erotic literature involving children: that is genuinely fucked up.

If Aimee is a victim of her father's abuse, imagine what she must be going through.

Regarding LGBTQ++++++, I have the feeling I am the only one who would defend them on Saidit, even if I don't understand their choices, in the least. If they harm children or others, yes, they should be locked up. If they don't, I think they have a right to their sexual choices (excluding child porn, which harms children).

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

Yes, though the partner claims his account was hacked (which is possible, when one considers the incredibly extensive attacks against these people).

He should have said his little brother typed it, be just as believable imo.

If Aimee is a victim of her father's abuse, imagine what she must be going through

She's Stockholmed at this point, that's why her seeking out the same sexual gratification as her father with the same older/younger dynamic is so worrisome. If she's carrying on that tradition maybe she's grooming kids too.

Regarding LGBTQ++++++, I have the feeling I am the only one who would defend them on Saidit

Lots of people would defend lgb here.

[–]GConly 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

aimee is a victim of her father's abuse, imagine what she must be going through.

Was. His. He.

This is not a woman, this is a man.

Let's remember he helped his dad get a job after the rape conviction campaigning for the greens.

I don't have much sympathy.

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I agree that there is no evidence of her being a pedophile herself as of right now. Even so, she seems like a very troubled person and it is very concerning the lengths she went to to defend her father as well as her husband who is a pedophile (though no evidence to suggest he actually did anything to children in real life). Still very concerning.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, very concerning.

Thankfully, the thought crimes division of Transphobiaville are on the case.

Jokes aside, apparently the husband wrote book or a document that promotes pedophelia, which should be addressed. I don't know what it is and don't want to know where it is.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He has straight up tweeted that he is into kids and has written smut involving minors.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Not too informative but check out https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=179918613 too. The bodybuilding forum is a fucking trip. I don't even lift but I been lurking at that place off and on over the years.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed - that is some interesting reading. It:

is enough to make my gorgeous locks go grey.

I lifted weights seriously for a few years long ago (Gold's Gym, when it started), and I suppose these comments don't surprise me. The weightlifting mindset helps with motivation, and is perhaps due to a higher level of testosterone (who knows), but one thing is sure: EVERYONE is D.C., not A.C., damnit! (Though ladies who will join threesomes & more are totally welcome.)

[–]againstpedorights 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Climb a mountain