Reddit admins just had a fucking MOMENT

submitted by Chipit from i.imgur.com

top 100 commentsshow all 124
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Chipit[S] 19 insightful - 4 fun19 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 4 fun -  (114 children)

what the fuck is her husband's deal lmao why would you EVER tweet the following:

Aww, seems MN is looking into my past and making me the bad guy now. As long as I'm going to be a target anyway, let's be open and honest about a few things. Whistleblower11087 has shared with the MN class, let's share it with all of you:

  1. I have given a reply to a self-claimed thirteen-years-old girl on Quora on the topic of Masturbation. I offered the advice that masturbation is natural and should be explored safely as she sees fit. I posted no images or graphic descriptions there.

  2. My YouTube favorites do, indeed, contain the Vocaloid song titled "I Can Take Off My Panties" which is a song lyrically about teenaged girls exploring the mental and social lines between adult and child. Like many Vocaloid songs, it is an upbeat pop song,

2b. and the lyrics hold deeper meanings than a cursory glance at the title might suggest.

  1. Yes. I have written smut. I have written smut featuring minors. I have written smut featuring incest. I have written smut featuring things that are not ethically sound or morally right in the real world. I also write smut featuring adults.

3b. The story cited is not one of my favorite stories, but it was an idea I had, nearly half a lifetime ago, that I wrote out and published out of a habit to publish more than a lust for children. My fanfiction tends to feature minors for

3c. one simple reason: those are the characters in the stories I am writing, and those are the ages at which I can best explore those characters based on their official depictions. Sometimes, I still engage in age progression of them to fit the stories I'm telling, though.

  1. Yup. I have no reason to hide the fact that I am sexually awakened adult who has fantasies that might be unethical to explore in real life. Many conservatives in my country seem to have their own unethical fantasies of killing people who disagree with them:

4b. I just have fantasies that I write stories about in order to explore and let out. I could explain common reasons for mind-control fetishism, but they won't matter to my enemies, so let's focus on the fact about hypnotism in real life and not many stories depict it.

4c. Hypnosis is a therapeutic tool for self-actualization and self-improvement. It allows a subject to achieve changes they want more quickly and easily. You cannot, in real life, be hypnotized into doing something you do not want.

  1. Back to fantasizing, yes, I fantasize about things I don't want to do in real life. I fantasize about things that are some combination of impossible, unethical, or otherwise outside of my personal capacity to act upon outside of fantasy. I fantasize about jumping 20 feet high

5b. and I don't think that means I can or that it would be safe to do so. I fantasize about children having sex, sometimes with adults, sometimes with other children, sometimes kidnapped and forced into bad situations, sometimes coerced through fantasy mind control.

5c. Then again, I don't fantasize about torturing people for my own enjoyment, I don't fantasize about real children (every story I've written features fictional characters) even if I fantasize myself with a fictional child. I have never looked at actual real-child pornography.

5d. It's a fantasy, like a child who pretends to be a dragon while their friend is a dragon-slaying knight, or a robber while their friends pretend to be police. It's make-believe and imaginary. 6. So how can @AimeeChallenor work with vulnerable teenagers when she's in a relationship with me? I don't have a violent bone in my body, and I have no interest in real children. In more than half of my lifetime, I have not "graduated" from a fetish for fantasy children to

6b. a fetish for real, living, breathing children, and I have never committed a single act of offense towards a real child. I don't even fantasize about real children. Consent requires mature awareness and reasonable equality and partnership. Without consent, all sex is rape.

6c. I will not engage in any sexual interaction without consent from a person with a mature mind and understanding of sex. I do not rape, because despite having some fantasies of rape, I do not genuinely wish to rape anybody of any age.

BDSM without an understanding of consent is abuse. BDSM without respect for consent is abuse. BDSM with an understanding of and the utmost respect for consent is not abuse.

I'm not purging my past to whitewash myself. I've done questionable things in my life, and I've written questionable stories, but I have no desire to harm people, even those who disagree with me. I have no desire to silence dissent until "dissent" becomes "threats."

So if you want to talk, begin by listening or reading. Know what you want to respond to and don't spew pointless nonsense.

Oh, one last note: I know nothing about the individuals Aimee works with or represents except as a class of people. I don't ask, she doesn't volunteer it, and she doesn't put any of them in contact with me.

Aside: Funny how I'm happy to address this openly but the MNer had to hide behind anonymity. I know myself and am comfortable addressing my bad points, but I guess they must fear for their safety if anybody ever knows who they are...

source: https://archive.is/zHQFu

That’s a lot of words to say “I’m a pedophile”. He could’ve just stopped at “1. I have given a reply to a self-claimed thirteen-years-old girl on Quora on the topic of Masturbation” and the case would’ve been closed but he really just kept going.

[–]jet199 26 insightful - 6 fun26 insightful - 5 fun27 insightful - 6 fun -  (98 children)

Aimee Challenor is a self proclaimed "little".

He literally larps as a child so adult men can pretend they are abusing a (large) child.

Anyone in a relationship with Aimee will be a paedo.

Aimee encourages and enables paedos. That's his main purpose in life after being groomed by his dad. That's the reason he went into politics and that's the reason he got a job with reddit.

Aimee even has a brother with exactly the same set of fetishes. It's no coincidence.

[–][deleted] 17 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 3 fun -  (97 children)

Aimee even has a brother with exactly the same set of fetishes. It's no coincidence

I didn't know that. What are the chances the father only groomed and raped the 3 children? Guy is in jail for 1, and his two kids were obviously abused. Sexual kinks don't really run in families normally.

And how many people did Aimee and her husband groom and rape?

I worry there's a whole lot of kids involved in this.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (96 children)

Not that I know much about this, but what I can see in the Spectator (https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-green-party-s-growing-contempt-for-women-s-rights) and on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aimee_Challenor) and in the recent Reddit activity is that there are serious, professional attacks against Aimee, at least some of which appear to be unfounded. The Specator is the Tory/alt-right announcement board for many, which is naturally attacking Aimee and the Green Party. It's what they do. Her Wikipedia page is obviously written by someone who wants to write mainly about her father, rather than about her, and is a remarkably professional direct attack on Aimee. If she's guilty of anything illegal, this should be addressed in a court of law. Perhaps she's a terrible person (I don't know), but the attacks on her are much more obvious, and show that there are some well-paid writers who are helping to remove her from politics, and if possible, from Reddit. As for Reddit mod policy, doxing should not be tolerated, so it seems /r/ukpolitics made the right decision.

[–][deleted] 24 insightful - 3 fun24 insightful - 2 fun25 insightful - 3 fun -  (66 children)

As for Reddit mod policy, doxing should not be tolerated, so it seems /r/ukpolitics made the right decision.

Nobody was doxxed though, a mod posted an article critical of the green party that mentioned Aimee but not reddit in any way, and he was banned by the admins but later restored.

professional attacks Perhaps she's a terrible person (I don't know

Her husband is a diaper wearing furry pedo. The third partner in their marriage is a diaper wearing furry pedo. She is a diaper wearing furry pedo. Her father is a diaper wearing pedo rapist kidnapper.

You see the massive red flag? This looks like a pattern of child abuse is being perpetuated. Now, if you're saying this is just a smear job, then I'd like to see the proof because the case for it is pretty convincing.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (65 children)

a mod posted an article critical of the green party that mentioned Aimee but not reddit

Perhaps the mod knew that Aimee was one of the subjects of the article and the comments on Reddit began to address Aimee's potential connection to Reddit, or as a mod. There is no evidence that she was was not outed/doxxed at Reddit, as we've seen no screenshots, and we're unlikely to see the comments that were deleted. But let's say none of this happened. Why therefore make the subreddit private? This is the reason they gave the next day:

Please do not name this individual, at all.

The only narrative we have is the one a Saiditor has given here, that the mod was banned and other decisions were made for Aimee.

Reddit indicates that she was doxxed. I see no evidence that she was not doxxed. (Perhaps someone could post this?)

Regarding 'diaper wearing furry pedos', are these bears that like to date children? (I've never heard this term, and not sure of the purpose of the diaper and fur. Remember the Eddie Murphy joke?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mFf5B5qEX4 )

[–]jet199 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (34 children)

"There is no evidence that she was was not"

There's a term for that.

It also translates to "there's no evidence she was"

Anyway, it's impossible to doxx a well known public figure with a well known username.

Even with address details if you're very involved in politics you can't be doxxed. Aimee Challenor ran for political office and registered their home address as their election office. His address is already public record.

They are just trying to kill the story with any excuse they can find.

Don't you feel dirty defending and distracting from paedophiles and their enablers just to troll people you look down on?

Or does the smug sense of self righteous virtue override any basic morality or human feelings?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (33 children)

OK - so she's famous enough to be harrassed and slandered without consequence.

I cannot find any evidence that she is a pedophile or has raped kids. Can you?

[–]GConly 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (19 children)

He.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (18 children)

British Government issued a new Birth Certificate recognising Challenor as female

[–]jet199 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I've never stated he did.

Stay on topic.

You seem to be creating a poor victim narrative all on your own here and strawmanning everyone else to do it.

Have some basic self appreciation.

[–]emptiedriver 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

I cannot find any evidence that she is a pedophile or has raped kids. Can you?

His father was convicted of raping a 10 year old girl, and his husband has posted those tweets as well as fantasy stories about child sex, and Challenor has maintained good relations with both of them, defending them or erasing any mention of problems when possible. He has also self-identified as a "little" which basically means lover of pedophiles. He may have been a victim in the beginning since he started to become a public figure before he was probably of age, but he's an adult now and part of a community that considers this okay.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Thanks for this. I appreciate that all of this is problematic, and have responded to some of this elsewhere. Her husband's twitter was supposedly hacked, he said, even if his comments might have been relatively consistent with his personal views about fantasies about kids. This is a thought crime, I suppose, and if he wrote it, he's of course an asshole, with pedophile tendencies. I've not seen the 'little' comment or the definition. I will not defend Aimee's poor choices. I've tried to point out - from a legal standpoint (not personal) - that there is no evidence that she (and perhaps her husband) is definitely, without a doubt, a pedophile or has raped kids.

Did she try to manipulate or censor information about her father or herself? From a legal point of view (again, not personal), this can be problematic if she controls a public forum. Reddit, however, is a private company, and most of her fellow mods seemingly supported her at the company.

Did she enable her father and/or husband to enjoy rape or child porn. I don't know. I've not seen the evidence.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (29 children)

Regarding 'diaper wearing furry pedos', are these bears that like to date children? (I've never heard this term, and not sure of the purpose of the diaper and fur. Remember the Eddie Murphy joke?:

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/aimee-challenor-ashton-lucas-david-challenor.47181/

https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/ashton-challenor-the-boy-who-disappeared

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

Thanks for these. Yes, her father is a monster. Just think of the lengths to which these writers are going to criticize her and her partner because of her father's actions. (And there is no evidence there of her as a pedophile or a rapist.)

[–][deleted] 15 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 3 fun -  (20 children)

The husband has written erotic literature involving children and admitted to being a attracted to kids in a now deleted tweet. They're all into this very particular kink that's very much like Aimee's father was. Both of Aimee's partners are older. I have no doubt she was the victim but she's into the kind of stuff that made her a victim.

At the very least these are serious allegations that need to be addressed. People have had far worse happen to them just for tweeting the wrong thing.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

Yes, though the partner claims his account was hacked (which is possible, when one considers the incredibly extensive attacks against these people). Sorry - thinking like a lawyer again - there is reasonable doubt for the the partner's Twitter case.

His erotic literature involving children: that is genuinely fucked up.

If Aimee is a victim of her father's abuse, imagine what she must be going through.

Regarding LGBTQ++++++, I have the feeling I am the only one who would defend them on Saidit, even if I don't understand their choices, in the least. If they harm children or others, yes, they should be locked up. If they don't, I think they have a right to their sexual choices (excluding child porn, which harms children).

[–][deleted] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I agree that there is no evidence of her being a pedophile herself as of right now. Even so, she seems like a very troubled person and it is very concerning the lengths she went to to defend her father as well as her husband who is a pedophile (though no evidence to suggest he actually did anything to children in real life). Still very concerning.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yes, very concerning.

Thankfully, the thought crimes division of Transphobiaville are on the case.

Jokes aside, apparently the husband wrote book or a document that promotes pedophelia, which should be addressed. I don't know what it is and don't want to know where it is.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Not too informative but check out https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=179918613 too. The bodybuilding forum is a fucking trip. I don't even lift but I been lurking at that place off and on over the years.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed - that is some interesting reading. It:

is enough to make my gorgeous locks go grey.

I lifted weights seriously for a few years long ago (Gold's Gym, when it started), and I suppose these comments don't surprise me. The weightlifting mindset helps with motivation, and is perhaps due to a higher level of testosterone (who knows), but one thing is sure: EVERYONE is D.C., not A.C., damnit! (Though ladies who will join threesomes & more are totally welcome.)

[–]againstpedorights 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Climb a mountain

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If she's guilty of anything illegal, this should be addressed in a court of law

Typically when someone is accused of being a pedophile/rapist their contact with children/alleged victims are severed while the claims are investigated. Supposedly Aimee is involved in subs targeted to children.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Was she accused of being a pedophile/rapist? Was she indicted?

I see no evidence of wrongdoing on her part.

She also tried to escape the abuse of her in the UK by moving to the US.

[–]jet199 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Any evidence that he moved to the US to escape abuse?

No.

He literally started he moved their to be with his paedo husband who he met online.

Why lie?

Why lie to yourself?

[–]slushpilot 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Silencing & threatening people seems to be Challenor's MO for a long time.

These don't sound like good qualifications for a community admin or political candidate. This person needs psychological help, not a position of power & influence. We'll see if it works out as well for Reddit as it did for the Greens and the LibDems. Seems right on track so far.

http://transcrimeuk.com/2018/06/27/aimee-challenor/

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

She was being doxxed on a subreddit.

I get it: Saiditors and others want to hate Reddit, and her and trans people. But there is no evidence of wrongdoing on her part.

[–]slushpilot 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Linking to an article with a public person's name—unrelated to Reddit—is not doxxing.

It's the hypersensitive overreaction that's the story here.

It's not about hating "trans people", it's people with a narcissistic personality disorder. "Needs help" ... I'm not the first to suggest it either.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

A brilliant video - I agree with every word. Thanks for sharing it.

And unless Aimee has done something that is illegal or especially abusive to others (other than asking for a subreddit intervention on her behalf), I would think she should be left alone to get on with her life.

[–]Happy_Blueberry3910 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I would think she should be left alone to get on with her life.

That's why some people join the politics, right?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Seems she was literally pushed out of two parties and politics altogether.

[–]Happy_Blueberry3910 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It seems that you speak like a typical leftist:

...Maybe... Perhaps... There is no evidence...

BUT YOU ARE ALL TRANSPHOBES!!!!!111

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Are you really a happy blueberry?

Here's the problem at Saidit: so many of the posts do not include reliable evidence. Even if someone posted something about free college education should be offered to everyone, or cancel all student debt, or raise the minimum wage, one could ask for the necessity for these liberal ideas. But those aren't the kinds of posts we're likely to see on Saidit.

[–]Happy_Blueberry3910 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Here's the problem at Saidit

It seems that censorship at Reddit isn't a problem for you. As long as they censor people with different opinions than yours.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I know we all don't like censorship at Reddit.

Regarding Redditor attacks on Aimee, shutting down the sub while mods figure it out seemed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Yes, the mod should not have been banned, which is why he was unbanned.

[–]Chipit[S] 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

The Specator is the Tory/alt-right announcement board for many,

Bahahhahahahahahaa. It's a paywall site which severely limits its reach. Nice smear though.

It's like the Biden laptop. The cover-up is more alarming than the actual event. Why would they go to such lengths to censor?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

*buahahahahahaha

[–]Chipit[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

You think that alt-right losers in basements worldwide shell out a subscription fee to The Telegraph? And then take direction from them? Because let's be clear that's exactly what you said.

Because if there's one thing the alt-right likes, it's mainstream media. Lol. At least make your lies believable.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

?

The Specator

I can see the articles without subscription, or I see their posts on Twitter and Facebook. Perhaps I'm not seeing everything. It's a right-wing rag. Not sure what you're on about. Perhaps it's behind a paywall where you're located. And no need to be so snarky. Many Tories happily subscribe to this thing.

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

A rag. For publishing news you don't agree with. Wow...just, wow.

Pray tell, which journalistic sources meet your stringent standards for objectivity? Oh, please say the New York Times or al-Guardian. Please please please. Or The Atlantic.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

al-Guardian? lol

Easy to answer: all of these, with a preference for the top center batch in green -

[–]jet199 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Many non tories too, so what?

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

why would you EVER tweet the following:

Because he's immersed in his own deviant community that has a deviant normal. I'm sure this seemed perfectly reasonable to him.

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

This is why viewing child porn increases offending because abuse becomes so normalised in their minds they start to think the average person can be convinced they didn't nothing bad.

[–]bobbobbybob 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

holy fuck

[–]Chipit[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Please share on all your other social media! This needs to go viral!

[–]jet199 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

The trouble is the way Aimee has poisoned the well with the woke elite any negative press about him will be seen as bullying a poor victim or transphobia rather than whistleblowing.

Edit: then socks goes on a troll spree and proves exactly that.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Lul, typical. What is he doing in this site? Is magnora7 sleeping?

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think he's done very well today.

He's shown up exactly what the woke attitude to this is and how morally bereft they are.

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 7 fun3 insightful - 6 fun4 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

on all your other social media

hmm. nowhere, then :D

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I know, I was shocked reading this too.

[–]Zednix 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

He is a pedophile. The Chellenor family is a clan of pedophiles and animal torturers. What a vile group of demented people.

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Oh, I didn't say yet that Aimee and his brother are also furies.

[–]Zednix 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I haven't seen anything showing them to be furies. Ashton Aimee's husband posts pedo porn on the internet

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Here ya go, furry proof: https://grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/ashton-challenor-the-boy-who-disappeared

[–]CastleHoward 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

There is something about Mumsnet that brings out the worst in these assholes. I think that they don't understand that the alpha predator for a paedophile is a 45 year old, middle class, English woman. These women are lawyers and doctors. They will take you down if you get on the list. They are frequently the only ones making sense in court.

[–]jet199 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Oh no, there's a paedo manifesto which says women need to be shut up and vilified for them to achieve their aims.

They know full well what they are doing smearing women with name calling.

https://twitter.com/PankhurstEM/status/991258039511670784?s=19

[–]JoeyJoeJoe 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

Have to wonder if there is any threshold whereby these honorary female pronouns being applied to a man get revoked? What began as a kindness for drag queens & the mentally ill has become a noose around our collective necks.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I feel like we already met that threshold. Playing the gender pretend game has become a real drag.

[–]asterias 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.reveddit.com/v/conspiracy/comments/mbkceh/fuck_aimee_challenor_and_her_child_raping_father/

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Spez WTF are you smoking hiring this person?

[–]jet199 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Enabling

[–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

"No one say this guy's name so we can continue to enjoy our ability to share our ideas."

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Meta

[–]Node 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Here on saidit, I would characterize the action to take with the reddit owners, admins, and employees as distributing a strong personal rebuttal to the individual members of that set, at their facility in San Francisco.

[–]Akali 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I mean, reddit has stopped being reddit in 2018 when it it began the banning spree after changing its user agreements.

What we see are just ripple effect of the 2018 ban. It's still a useful forum for stuff unrelated to politics. If you seek cooking advice, you'll find good cooking advice. Same for books to read or music to listen to or how to learn to play guitar.

The platform is showing that it doesn't want to be on the spotlight of the media. subs like Watchpeopledie were strange social experiment, but those days are over. Now reddit isn't a social experiment, but just a Quora 2.0. Take it at what it is and move on.

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's a hard left echo chamber administered by pedophiles.