you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

I would agree, and go further - Winston Churchill was MUCH worse than Hitler.

In 1919 he unapologetically wanted to gas thousands if not millions of Russian Bolsheviks in Northern Russia, as well as on Northern India, and against Kurds and Afghans. An actual racist (as many were back then), among other things in this BBC article The 10 greatest controversies of Winston Churchill's career, that I looked up for the date.

This article (https://winstonchurchill.org/publications/finest-hour/finest-hour-160/leading-myths-churchill-advocated-the-first-use-of-lethal-gas/) starts with a faulty premise in a propaganda twist that anyone suggests he was the first.

Churchill forced Germany into war. People say Germany invaded Poland first, but those idiots don't know about the false flag and circumstances leading to that. I'm not saying that Hitler was innocent, but as Churchill famously said, "History will be kind to me for I intend to write it." As victors do. Hitler had no global dominance plans. That's bullshit to make him seem scary.

Not mentioned is that Churchill orchestrated the circumstances that compelled the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor to drag the US into WWII.

During WWII Churchill authorized countless war crimes, including the firebombing of Dresden, redefining war (between armies) into total war (including innocent civilians of women, children, and men as well as their infrastructures and resources).

Despite what the Zionist media would have you believe, especially since the 1970s onward, Hitler actually kept concentration camps for prisoners of war. In part because he knew if they lost they would be more severely punished. Meanwhile Britain took little care for prisoners of war and executed countless and sent some worthy prisoners to Canadian camps.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Winston+Churchill+war+crimes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bombing_of_Dresden_in_World_War_II

[–]GreenCappy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I didn't know about Churchill so it's good but "zionist media" yikes... Antisemitic canard ? I don't care what media says what Hitler still killed 6 million Jews. And Hitler is still one of the worst people in humanity.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So the government and media perpetually get caught lying all through history - yet you're willing to believe them on one issue?

I start from a place of skepticism and need to be proven they are speaking truth, as they can do from time to time, though rarely without an agenda. (ie. People die from terrorists in America, but more people die from peanut butter and bee stings and slipping in the bathtub. I'd use corona as an example but all the numbers are so completely wild they are utterly useless - proving my point.)

Learning the inconvenient truths about the Holocaust exaggerations was the second hardest thing for me to come around on, after the Climate Change hysteria for their Carbon Tax Scam.

Read these 14 points, to start questioning: https://infogalactic.com/info/Truther_Top_20_Counter_Points_To_The_Official_Holocaust_Story

Research yourself. Don't take my word for it. Make up your own mind. Maybe it was real. I certainly don't think so. But I'm legally not allowed to question it here in Canada, very loosely enforced, while in Germany you are severely punished for actually diving into history that counters the official narrative. More than suspicious - like how they are now censoring Corona information that may or may not save lives - but we're forbidden and MUST have blind faith in the authorities and "experts".

HISTORY IS FULL OF LIES and will keep getting rewritten for new agendas.