This Advocate? The one that thinks Gays Against Groomers is a hate group? You should try reading the Advocate again some time. It's not what it used to be. (Truly, whose side are you on, here? (Do you want to know what is going on, or not? There are additional links I've already included in another comment as well. Want to imply those are also not credible stories for unrelated reasons? Please, do step up with the evidence and we can discuss.) Is there some mystery about why what's being reported here shouldn't be taken seriously because The Federalist reported it? That's the problem. Even Tucker Carlson gets to look sane and rational right now on occasion because he's one of the only games in town for amplifying some GC messages. This isn't news to you, right?)

We all know quite well that we are struggling with a media problem in which vastly more conservative media will cover this issue than others. If the substance of the article is sound, then yes, it is worth sharing. We are all smart people here who understand the gray areas we are dealing with. There is even a guidance bot on this post offering reminders about that.