Targeting / Harassment‘Woke Homophobia Is Real’: Paypal, Gmail, Twitter Lock Out LGBT Nonprofit That Opposes Sexualizing Kids

submitted by wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. from thefederalist.com

all 11 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Users often report submissions from this site and ask us to remove it. We oppose blanket banning any news source. Users have a responsibility to be skeptical, check sources, and comment on any flaws.

Users can help improve this thread by linking to media that verifies or questions this article's claims - your link(s) can help all of our readers better understand this issue.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Multiple entities were booted from payment platforms.

A few more links:

From Gays Against Groomers themselves: https://twitter.com/againstgrmrs/status/1573318911172677634

Daily Mail: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11242183/amp/Jack-Dee-closes-Paypal-account-online-payments-giant-cancels-Free-Speech-Union.html

The Telegraph: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/09/22/corporations-allowed-decide-opinions-permissible-free-speech/ -- ARCHIVE: https://archive.ph/ONVfH

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

The Federalist describing the Advocate as a radical left wing publication should sound a warning that they are not our friends any more than TRAs.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This Advocate? The one that thinks Gays Against Groomers is a hate group? You should try reading the Advocate again some time. It's not what it used to be. (Truly, whose side are you on, here? (Do you want to know what is going on, or not? There are additional links I've already included in another comment as well. Want to imply those are also not credible stories for unrelated reasons? Please, do step up with the evidence and we can discuss.) Is there some mystery about why what's being reported here shouldn't be taken seriously because The Federalist reported it? That's the problem. Even Tucker Carlson gets to look sane and rational right now on occasion because he's one of the only games in town for amplifying some GC messages. This isn't news to you, right?)

We all know quite well that we are struggling with a media problem in which vastly more conservative media will cover this issue than others. If the substance of the article is sound, then yes, it is worth sharing. We are all smart people here who understand the gray areas we are dealing with. There is even a guidance bot on this post offering reminders about that.

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes it’s shit now and a TRA mouthpiece but radical left wing is a bit of a stretch. I’m not saying we shouldn’t share it either. That should be obvious from my posting.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I just archived the vast majority of the articles that come up under "trans" search hits for The Advocate, because when you are logged in to archive.org and visit the archive page, you can do efficient things like include outlinks. Here's a nice gem for you, if you think they haven't been captured—they have declared, just like our friends at Pink News, that Marsha P. Johnson was transgender. Which directly contradicts Johnson's own self-characterization, preserved on video.

If anyone should be able to keep that information straight and understand why it's a crucial distinction, it would be The Advocate. And yet.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220831061353/https://www.advocate.com/people/2022/8/24/celebrating-marsha-p-johnson-lgbt-community-center

[–]ChunkeeguyTeam T*RF Fuck Yeah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh I know they’ve been captured. No question about it. I wouldn’t line a bird cage with it. But radical left wing is a bit of a stretch.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Probably a fair point. I make little effort anymore to ascertain which flavor of left is being a mess in the present moment. It seems to be a shared affliction.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Eva Karilova got suspended for using the Gays Against Groomers banner but Streisand effect ensued.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yup. It was brief though and she's back. They will never learn that "don't look at that" makes people want to look at that.

[–]automoderatorHuman-Exclusionary Radical Overlord[M] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

RIP Snappy, I AM THE NEW GOD!

Click below to view and/or archive snapshots:

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this sub if you have any questions or concerns.