you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

That's definitely an interesting element of this, yes.

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, and it absolutely works to our benefit that things kick off in the UK first where there is more centralization of health information, the ongoing Cass Review, and lack of the Big Pharma stranglehold on politicians. Everything that comes out in the UK action can be used to lay a case in the United States without having to worry about setting bad precedent in the U.S. first. Plus I think UK litigation moves much more quickly than U.S. litigation.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi.[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have been wondering about how the UK situation could benefit actions in the US. It seems inevitable that outcomes there could and would be incorporated here, so this is great insight to have, thank you. It would be great if all of their hard work wasn't isolated to their own borders.