you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SilverWolf 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

lesbians and gay men to "break down our sexual boundaries" because saying "no" is discrimination

and

the trans community just sort of "expect" bisexuals to sleep with them.

These are your answer, lesbians and gay men have a major sexual boundary of "no dicks" or "no vaginas" but you'll never hear a real bisexual person have an issue with either of those, meaning that being bi is "acceptable" and there is no need to convert them. Theres also the possibility that, since cotton refers to lesbian women and boxer refers to gay men, bisexuals just get grouped in with whatever sex they are.

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

you'll never hear a real bisexual person have an issue with either of those

Erm...yes you will, when we are presented with poor approximations of those bits attached to the wrong bodies.

[–]SilverWolf 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Ok yeah, but those aren't the real thing so I wasn't considering those

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Won't it be great when we can get back to that as our default understanding? /rhetorical /sarcasm