you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]CaptainMooseEx-Bathhouse Employee 25 insightful - 1 fun25 insightful - 0 fun26 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

To my surprise, I was a very popular guy at the pool. I hadn't expected the penis-less guy to get much attention at a gay men's resort, but a lot of guys were very flattering and approached me to talk about my tattoos, being trans, etc. On the significantly weirder end of the spectrum, yesterday I found out one guy had thought I was cis and that I had chopped my dick off. I was like 😳😂😳 how did that seem like a more likely option than me being trans???

Do these women ever consider that gay men have been trained to be nice to them even when we are uncomfortable? Christ, the number of times I've had women thrust sexual shit on me and I've had to pretend I'm okay with it only for them to later think I'm secretly bi is too many to count. We don't tell you that you look pretty because we believe it, we do so because you throw temper tantrums even if we quietly look at our phones. We also run the risk of losing our jobs, not being promoted even if we merit it, and losing career connections if we set boundaries. Don't be fucking stupid, ma'am.

And to answer the general question, they will start invading single-sex private spaces such as parties and orgies because dopey white knights will bring them to be "inclusive."

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]ElectraHeart 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They will never do this to straight men. Because unlike gay men, heterosexual men are dangerous, and they also run the entire show. Thats why despite all their claims of a 'trans genocide', they never advocate for anything that might actually harm heterosexuals. Hell, even the most random supersexual stuff blew up in a single day more than anything radfems, gc or drop the t could achieve in years. Supersexuals never had any ideology, any rallying cries, anything at all. But look at the cultural capital they had. The backlash was so visible that it was for a long time the first time i saw gendies afraid of losing their hegemony over the discourse. Talking over gay people is easy. Gay people are marginalised, and distanced from the sources of power. Heterosexuals? They're would tear apart the entire house of cards they built in a single day. Not that they care about women or gay people, they would do it for their dicks or something, hence why the issue is always 'gay men don't eat my neovagina' and never 'heterosexual men don't allow trans people into their porn subs' or 'heterosexual men do not see us as real women'.

    They were able to talk over us because unlike heterosexual men, we were kind and open minded, and they took advantage of our desire to be open minded. There exists no other demographics other than women and gays that they can pull something like this. Its the reason why transracialism do not exist, while race, when compared to sex, is less of a material reality. So in the end, it will end up like how all rot ends: they will ruin everything and then will be unable to find new hosts to plague.