you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Datachost 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'm currently serving a seven day suspension for posting in TiA and I still don't know why exactly. My post just called someone terminally online and apparently that's against the new hate rules, somehow.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I suspect they take the totality of ones post history into account. I doubt I was suspended solely for the one comment. What I think happened: fragile "hey bro yass king" transman couldn't handle direct confrontation with biological truth and did what any teenage girl totally valid macho-man would do and asked for an authority figure to step in, i.e. reported the comment. Then an Admin looked at my post history as a whole (utterly transphobic, no apologies) and decided to send me a warning.

So if you're not sure which comment prompted a suspension, the most accurate answer is probably "all of them".

[–]Datachost 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're probably right there. Across my account I've definitely frequently flirted with a suspension/outright banning of the account with some of my comments, which I'm absolutely not going to change. Wouldn't surprise me if my constant rants about the connections between certain prominent trans people and paedophilia was what got me this time

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh NOES! We can't reveal well-documented TRA links to pedophilia spread hate!! No wonder you got 7 days instead of just the 3 I got.

[–]NutterButterFlutterStill waving into the void[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just took a look at the conversation. Looks like you said:

Talk about terminally online. I don't know what's worse, them tracking it or having done it often enough that they can produce 37% as a result

Someone who responded to you got their comment removed too (although they don't appear to have been suspended), and they said:

They're known to do better, let's push those numbers to 40+

My guess is you both were falsely reported because "someone" (AHS) thought you were joking about the 40% trans suicide thing. Although anyone with half a brain would realize you both were referring to the posted image where someone said they have a 37% success rate in getting accounts suspended.

You could probably appeal the suspension if you care enough to.