all 8 comments

[–]CancelPowerSuper Bi Male 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My first account got banned from Reddit because I said that I'm not attracted to them. Basically the subreddit(r/bisexual) was FULL of transgenders, "omnisexuals", "pansexuals" and shit like that. Every single made-up sexuality/gender except actual bisexuals.

I replied on a question about preferences that I'm not attracted to transgenders because I just don't like artificial surgery-made genitals and even without them, I'm not attracted to feminine men/masculine women. I got bashed by comments calling me a disgusting transphobe, the usual. But what shocked me the most is that everybody in the comment thread agreed that it isn't okay to have preferences based on natural/artificial genitals, they literally said that. I'm not even kidding. I was like the fuck, I'm in no way going to be attracted to neo-vaginas in any way possible. I got then permanently banned from the subreddit and later suspended from Reddit as whole.

My mistake was posting on LGB spaces instead of just sticking to programming and my other stuff subreddits.

Until the trans admins get the fuck out, Reddit is never going to be a sane place.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

F*** the inverted peen, bigot.

Considering that there are boatloads of people who don't even like enhanced body parts like silicone breasts on females and pecs on males(body features that are at least sex appropriate), the fact that many don't like "penises" on females and moobs and "vaginas" on males should not be as controversial a thing as it is.

Only Trans are allowed to turn down other Trans. Everyone else needs to educate themselves and unpack their genital preferences.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Here you go, just in time for Censorship Thursday. In response to this comment. I am now suspended from Reddit for 3 days.

I am very amused. Biological facts => suspension. (Yes I was intentionally being a dick, no apologies given the circumstances.)

[–]Datachost 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I'm currently serving a seven day suspension for posting in TiA and I still don't know why exactly. My post just called someone terminally online and apparently that's against the new hate rules, somehow.

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I suspect they take the totality of ones post history into account. I doubt I was suspended solely for the one comment. What I think happened: fragile "hey bro yass king" transman couldn't handle direct confrontation with biological truth and did what any teenage girl totally valid macho-man would do and asked for an authority figure to step in, i.e. reported the comment. Then an Admin looked at my post history as a whole (utterly transphobic, no apologies) and decided to send me a warning.

So if you're not sure which comment prompted a suspension, the most accurate answer is probably "all of them".

[–]Datachost 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're probably right there. Across my account I've definitely frequently flirted with a suspension/outright banning of the account with some of my comments, which I'm absolutely not going to change. Wouldn't surprise me if my constant rants about the connections between certain prominent trans people and paedophilia was what got me this time

[–]IridescentAnacondastrictly dickly 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh NOES! We can't reveal well-documented TRA links to pedophilia spread hate!! No wonder you got 7 days instead of just the 3 I got.

[–]NutterButterFlutterStill waving into the void[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just took a look at the conversation. Looks like you said:

Talk about terminally online. I don't know what's worse, them tracking it or having done it often enough that they can produce 37% as a result

Someone who responded to you got their comment removed too (although they don't appear to have been suspended), and they said:

They're known to do better, let's push those numbers to 40+

My guess is you both were falsely reported because "someone" (AHS) thought you were joking about the 40% trans suicide thing. Although anyone with half a brain would realize you both were referring to the posted image where someone said they have a 37% success rate in getting accounts suspended.

You could probably appeal the suspension if you care enough to.