all 27 comments

[–]julesburm1891 40 insightful - 3 fun40 insightful - 2 fun41 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

So, uh, I hate to break it to you but there are differences in between male and female hands, foreheads, and shoulders. I mean, look around you. You don’t need a PhD in biology. You only require functioning eyes to notice the differences. Just because they aren’t sexual organs doesn’t mean those differences are negligible. They matter a whole lot.

Bruh, just admit you’re bi and chill out.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 29 insightful - 4 fun29 insightful - 3 fun30 insightful - 4 fun -  (5 children)

It's almost as though humans are a sexually dimorphic species, mainly when it comes to our bodies, and there are several things different between men and women that aren't just what genitals they were borm with

[–]julesburm1891 28 insightful - 1 fun28 insightful - 0 fun29 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don’t understand why these people try to pretend they were raised by wolves and have not spent their entire lives surrounded by other members of our species. Stop playing games and admit that male and female humans are, in fact, physically different. We can all see it as plain as day. This has been observed by every society until this lot came along.

[–][deleted] 20 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 2 fun21 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Reminds me of getting into an argument with a guy the other day who insisted that the basis for sexual orientation was clothing and used Bacha bazi from Afghanistan as evidence of this since the pedophiles make the boys dress like girls.

He completely denied that biology played any role in attraction and it was entirely based on clothing and other social things.

[–]julesburm1891 20 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I’ve never been able to fathom how anyone entertains that argument. Different cultures have different ideas of what constitutes feminine and masculine attire. For example, traditional Saudi menswear is pretty feminine by Western standards. Oddly enough, I’ve yet to encounter a straight Western man or a lesbian Westerner who looks at Saudi men and goes, “aww hell yes, that is what I want in my bed.” Maybe, just maybe, it’s because it’s readily apparent that they’re males who just happen to wear clothing our culture generally doesn’t associate with men.

[–]hufflepuff-poet 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If anything Bacha Bazi and other unhealthy examples of forced sexuality show how dangerous it is to view sexuality through the lens of gender. It's all stereotypes that force people to deny or hide their attraction and seek out exploitative ways to fulfill their desires. If homosexuality was normalized and accepted, men could date and have sex with other men openly and not rape young boys and force them to dress as girls because "it's not gay if he's underage"(?!??)

[–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If homosexuality was normalized and accepted, men could date and have sex with other men openly and not rape young boys and force them to dress as girls because "it's not gay if he's underage"(?!??)

It's interesting how societies known to be extremely homophobic seem to have no problem with pederasty.

Two adult men fucking each other? Haram.

An adult men fucking a male kid? Sacred.

Does not compute...

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Just because they aren’t sexual organs doesn’t mean those differences are negligible. They matter a whole lot.

Yeah... because, while they're not primary sex characteristics (like genitals), they ARE secondary sex characteristics... and that's still, yanno, sex characteristics. Something that humans are biologically hardwired to recognize, and respond to. Notably sexually: they're a major source of attraction, being much more obvious (in most cases) than genitals.

And, for anyone who's exclusively male-attracted, female secondary sex characteristics-- such as smaller hands, foreheads, shoulders, and skeletal structure in general-- are like being constantly reminded, "this is not what I want."

[–]censorshipment 27 insightful - 5 fun27 insightful - 4 fun28 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

🤦🤣 the middle part took me out! Hands, shoulders, lips, foreheads "have no gender". Oh but they do.

I saw a video on IG of a blindfolded husband squeezing women's hands at a party to guess which hand was his wife's hand. He guessed correctly.

We can feel differences, if we are intimately familiar with body parts. I do feel sorry for gay folks who haven't been intimate with the same sex and may be duped by trans folk. I'm so glad I was sexually experienced BEFORE this era of queer.

[–]JulienMayfair 20 insightful - 17 fun20 insightful - 16 fun21 insightful - 17 fun -  (0 children)

And then my trans man boyfriend blew his load in my mouth . . .

. . . said no one ever.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 23 insightful - 5 fun23 insightful - 4 fun24 insightful - 5 fun -  (3 children)

A dildo doesn’t get an erection.

[–]DrMantisToboggan 20 insightful - 7 fun20 insightful - 6 fun21 insightful - 7 fun -  (2 children)

Cue the FTMs who will say some cis men can't get erections or some cis men had their dicks blown off.

[–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care 19 insightful - 2 fun19 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Cue the FTMs who will say some cis men can't get erections or some cis men had their dicks blown off.

But the thing is, and these people seem not to get it: FtMs aren't males with ED or who had their dicks blown off (pun intended?), but females who took exogenous testosterone in order to mimick masculine secondary sex characteristics.

No surgery or hormones in the world will change that.

[–]tu_jode_mucho 14 insightful - 14 fun14 insightful - 13 fun15 insightful - 14 fun -  (1 child)

LMAO "yes sir" yea I'm certain the hairy straight lady with no boobs and laryngitis voice just KNOWS how to dominate and lay some silicon dick down.

[–]reluctant_commenter 7 insightful - 5 fun7 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Ugh, somehow I missed that detail at first glance. Time to go find a trash can.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 19 insightful - 3 fun19 insightful - 2 fun20 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Oh, I remember this cringey cope of a comic.

There's much more of it too. And he tries his darndest throughout to convince the reader with non integral things like gender expression that he is totally gold-star gay but even the drawing of the trans here sabotages that effort by looking plainly female.

[–]strawberrycake 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah yes, some nostalgic propaganda I remember falling for when I believed in gender. I hated my sexuality so much I tried to identify to something more politically correct. Dark times that they will deny anyone experiences

[–]Femaleisnthateful 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The size differential makes them look like there's a sizeable age difference...

[–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care 11 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I noticed this too, he draws every FtM in the same way as a prepubescent boy.

Even the TRAs gave him shit for it, but for the wrong reasons of course...

[–]Socialjustus 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hands have no gender

Seinfeld would beg to differ.