Completely nonsense to think femininity is about makeup. Face paint wasn't a case for most history do you think women weren't feminine in the past? A woman can totaly be being naturally without having nothing on their face. I refer to a traditional femininity look which isn't similar to a name. Femininity is also internal. That's why a gay male can be feminine even having masculine looks. It's natural mannerism, the one someone carry thesmselves, even sit, overall character. Also don't get how you relate men being gentle to dressing a woman, you have a weird idea of masculine or femininity. Any woman who isn't a doormat also search for gentleness and sensibility in their partner. And that doesn't prevent someoe for also having a strong assertive character, as assertive doesn't mean aggressive asshole, but just self-assured and someone who speak their mind clearly without being easily influenced.

I would feel less safe with a a man at night, for obvious reasons of men being naturally much stronger and lilely to commit crimes than women. I wouldn't consider a masculine woman more dangerous than a feminine one. But still all of this has nothing to do with you reducing femininity to makeup and being submissive to men, or seeing men as just dominant assertive without the ability to kindness sensitivity. What I see it is just an extreme gender roles divide, which I've notice in you USA culture and which I find absolutely repulsive. But nice rant,eh!

And I do love femininity, not in the makeup obsessed version you seem to think femininity is about. But what aI love the most is the idea of a relationship free of gender roles and power dynamic. Because as much as I don't like gender oles in hetero couples, I find homosexual couple followingit way sadder. As sad as the people (especially gay) who cannot fathom a balanced equal relationships which doesnt follow pathetic 1950 gender dynamics