all 13 comments

[–][deleted] 33 insightful - 4 fun33 insightful - 3 fun34 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

No LGB without the T

Yes, LGB people will simply stop existing if the self-ID'ed fetishists weren't pandered to anymore.

[–]Dromedary 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Lol. What would we do without them? Transgender women of color gave us all of our rights AND solved the AIDS crisis!

[–]ZveroboyAlinaclownfish is a clown or a fish? || Febfem 34 insightful - 2 fun34 insightful - 1 fun35 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I believe it is from a protest against LGB Alliance.

There are dozens of charities and organizations Trans-only, who are not for LGB at all, just trans. Yet, they don't want LGB to have even one organization/charity without T. It is pretty abusive relationship - they can do whatever they want, and we can do only what they want and not what we want.

[–]Rage-Xion 19 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 0 fun20 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Their logic is that you can't exclude T from LGB because "some transwomen are lesbians". (Of course, we see them as heterosexual men.)

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Their logic is that you can't exclude T from LGB because "some transwomen are lesbians". (Of course, we see them as heterosexual men.)

I want these people to explain why, if such transwomen are lesbians and not heterosexual men, they ONLY pursue biological women, never each other. There should be no difference, right? TWAW and all that. So what gives? But if they're actually straight dudes? Makes perfect sense.

And hey, if even THEY won't buy the bullshit they're peddling... why the hell should anyone else?

[–]Neo_Shadow_LurkerPronouns: I/Don't/Care 17 insightful - 2 fun17 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's almost like straight men aren't into dick... almost!

[–]ZveroboyAlinaclownfish is a clown or a fish? || Febfem 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I saw excuse that "it triggers their dysphoria".

[–]reluctant_commenter 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

they ONLY pursue biological women, never each other.

The most extreme AGP transgender-identified males do. But even that seems relatively rare.

[–]ZveroboyAlinaclownfish is a clown or a fish? || Febfem 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It can go other way. Some lesbians are trans - so why exclude LGB from T-only organizations?

[–]fuck_reddit 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

God they are so self centered and self important. Are they admitting they’re holding us hostage? Is that why we aren’t allowed to leave? Cause we got along for millennia without then.

[–]DropItLikeItsHot 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We can exist just fine without having to cater to mentally ill fetishists who demand their public fetishism be validated.

[–]reluctant_commenter 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Holding us hostage. LGB people should be allowed to form LGB-specific groups without the T. No argument about it.

I think most straight people don't realize that LGB people are not ALLOWED to form our own specific sub-groups apart from the "LGBTQ+" groups. We aren't. If we try, we get harassed, demonized, and discriminated against BY people in the "LGBTQ+ community". We all here on this sub know firsthand, this is the story of LGB communities on Reddit. But it's also the story of LGB communities more broadly. Ever wonder why there aren't any lesbian bars anymore...?

I need to compile a list of resources that are the easiest to digest and most accessible to straight people who have no idea what's going on with the TQ+ movement. Stuff like this post serve as a reminder.