you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 23 insightful - 2 fun23 insightful - 1 fun24 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

She's a fetishist.

[–]DropItLikeItsHot 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They're all fetishists to one degree or another, and more importantly they're reality denialists. "You must validate my perception of reality or you are a bigot" is always going to be massively problematic, whether your transness comes from gender dysphoria or autogynephilia.

[–]MarkJeffersonTight defenses and we draw the line 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The gender dysphoria for some identifying as trans is the only true part. And if that was all they wanted others to acknowledge then that would be fine with me. I can't prove it one way or the other. But any further than that is where the denial of physical reality and language corruption begins, with the 'pronouns are rohypnol' type of thing that warp perceptions and weaken arguments. I mean, if they were being honest and productive with labels they would call themselves their own sex, stop using terms for the other sex, just label themselves Dysphoric Trans, and that would help us a lot against the people with the aggressive paraphilias, who use inaccurate labels as a cudgel.