you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]reluctant_commenter 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I know some people (including myself) have reservations about the LGB Alliance as a group, but I would still call this a win-- they should have been allowed to have charitable status in the first place, even if they were a transgender rights group.

Optically, this is good, because it shows that there are charities focused on LGB issues, and charities focused on trans issues, and... oh, wait, there are LGB-specific charities I can support, without any of the child medicalization or invented pronouns bullshit? It'll be news to a lot of people.

(Sort-of LGB charities. But maybe that discussion belongs on a different post.)

[–]yousaythosethingsFind and Replace "gatekeeping" with "having boundaries" 18 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 1 fun19 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, I totally agree. This is a win. It is an important step in breaking through the censorship and illusory bonds holding together this fake concept of an “LGBTQ Community.” Given the choice, a lot of people would just rather not real with gender ideology if they can avoid it bc even those who don’t know the details can see it’s at minimum a lot of drama and totally unrelatable to ordinary LGB people.