you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cutenoobies 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Banned from r/harrypotter for saying that JKR's new book doesn't have any transphobia for portraying a man in a dress to kill women. Reason the pathetic mods gave that I was defending her transphobia, and they permanently banned me. Fuck their echo chamber that stays relevant because of her work, but at the same time they don't even want to allow any discussion in her favour.

[–]julesburm1891 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I’ve gotten to the point where I want to drop kick people who flip out over Troubled Blood without actually having read it.

For those who haven’t read it, here is all the “transphobia” in the 900+ page book: 1. A serial killer named Dennis Creed is known to have worn a wig and women’s coat when he abducted one woman. This was to disguise himself, not to cross dress. 2. It’s noted at one point that Creed would steal women’s underwear as a youth so he could masturbate in them. It should be noted that Creed was based on Jerry Brudhos and this was a nod to Brudhos’ doing that with women’s shoes. 3. Creed keeps his victims’ jewelry stashed away under a floorboard as trophies. When the prosecution mentions this at his trial, Creed’s defense is that he cross dresses sometimes. Everyone knows it’s bullshit because Creed’s smirking when he says it and he photographed the victims extensively while they still had on the jewelry. 4. When Strike (the main character) confronts Creed in prison Creed states that he would pretend to be gay and act effeminate so women would drop their guard around him and make it easier for him to abduct them.

Unless discussing antisocial behaviors, sexual paraphilia, or predatory behavior is now transphobic, there is nothing transphobic in the book.

Anyways, sorry you got banned. But, yes, fuck people who want to profit in some way off JKR’s work but want to throw her under the bus.

[–]PeakingPeachEaterfemale♀ | detrans🦎 | eater of peaches 🍑 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So basically...these people are somewhat self aware that they're autogynephiles(ex. MEN in a dress with a fetish) and don't want to be called out, so they call it transphobic hahah. That's precious.

I might read that book now! Sounds interesting.

[–]julesburm1891 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Essentially, yes. Rowling doesn’t mention trans people anywhere in the book. People who’ve read it and are mad seem to believe that a character who’s a misogynistic sociopath with weird fetishes is a stand in for trans people. Frankly, that says more about TRAs than it does Rowling.

The series is actually really good! The first two are kind of classic whodunnits, but the third takes a much darker and psychological turn. You can definitely read them on their own, but there’s a lot of character development if you go through in order.

[–]PeakingPeachEaterfemale♀ | detrans🦎 | eater of peaches 🍑 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Discussions doesn't seem to exist anymore on Reddit. I remembered they just used to downvote unpopular opinions down to oblivion, now they report, remove, ban, then perma bann users for hurting their feelings.

I like with saidit, that there's no down vote option, because downvotes límits discussion. The original purpose of down votes on reddit, supposedly was for off topic comments I heard, not disagreements.