all 9 comments

[–]BEB[S] 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

From the announcement:

"A conformist and rigidly policed LGBTQIA+ mindset is seen by increasing numbers of lesbian women and gay men as confusing to the reality of their biological same sex attraction. Lesbian and Gay News will accept that a lesbian woman’s viewpoint may not be exactly the same as LGBTQIA+ groupthink and that a gay man may not have exactly the same perspective as a transman, or non-binary man, or a man who defines himself as queer. "

[–]lovelyspearmintLesbeing a lesbian 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

They'll still have transgender writers, from what it says in the announcement.

[–]BEB[S] 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm guessing to avoid being called "bigots" right off the bat. And old school trans-sexuals are often well-aware that the gender lobby is madness and doesn't represent their interests either.

[–]homosomes 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If the transgender people involved are actual homosexuals or bisexuals, I think I'd be okay with it. If they start pushing cotton/boxer ceiling rhetoric or claiming they're lichrally in the wrong body though I'll definitely be writing to the editor.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hope they're just saying that to appear inclusive when they aren't. The bar is pretty low nowadays, literally no proof is needed to identify as whatever you want, so it's an easy system to exploit

[–]our_team_is_winning 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I thought this is so promising and then, bam, this:

<We’re lining up an impressive range of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender writers >

[–]reluctant_commenter 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

[–]BEB[S] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yes, you're right, it is the same media outlet - sorry, I was thrown by the title of the other post.

[–]reluctant_commenter 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No worries, happens all the time :)