you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]winterwillow 22 insightful - 7 fun22 insightful - 6 fun23 insightful - 7 fun -  (1 child)

just that sex has little to nothing to do with gender.

Great. And since we're same-sex attracted, someone's gender identity has little to nothing to do with our sexual attraction. Glad we cleared that up!

Edit: And could these white knights please stop misusing the term 'dogwhistle' and especially when it comes a missing space between trans and woman. Yeah sure when I went on /gc in 2014 there where still people trying to reach a compromise by saying there are 'women' and 'transwomen', however that wasn't enough to appease the TRAs and that ship sailed years ago. Radfems don't hang around twitter 'dogwhistling' with the word 'transwomen', they say trans-identified male nowadays.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 16 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Great. And since we're same-sex attracted, someone's gender identity has little to nothing to do with our sexual attraction. Glad we cleared that up!

Yes, THIS all fucking day!!! Should be our go-to whenever the "be-attracted-to-someone-based-on-their-gender-or-else" bullshit starts flying. Seriously. Just tell 'em that, while maybe their sexuality works that way, ours simply does not. So we're sexually-incompatible with them: like oil and water... the two don't mix. The end.

Has anyone tried this one out in the wild? Maybe we could come up with a snappy nickname for it? The "oil & water argument" maybe?