you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What is the endgame of this argument?

To validate asexuality as an approved sexuality. LGBA and all. Those other letters, though... those ones are just identities!

[–]oofreesouloo⚡super lesbian⚡ 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Asexuals shouldn't be lumped in together with LGB. We have nothing in common with asexuals. LGB is for same sex attracted people. What we experience and the discrimination we face is very different from asexuals. Asexuals don't even face discrimination at all.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Asexuals are alienated, not discriminated against.

[–]oofreesouloo⚡super lesbian⚡ 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

True

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed - that's my point. But then, when the argument comes for what an innate sexuality is, there's no evidence for anyside - hetero, homo, bi, a, the gender brigade), so I think that's where LGB loses even more ground. I assume that's the nature of setting up the "debate" around genital preferences and fluidity.