you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Silverdarling 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So as I understand it, in the new acronym soup there's no longer a Stonewall-approved sexuality to define those of us who fancy both men and women. Or those of us who only fancy the same sex. Like all same-sex attracted people now are told we must fancy transfolk or else we're evil 'transphobes' who will be excommunicated from the church of LGB??

Are straights allowed to keep 'heterosexual' to mean the opposite sex or are the wokescolds now redefining that for them too? I can't remember if 'straight' has its own little flag now for the corporate 'anyone can be queer' Pride money-grubbing.

But I'd LOVE to watch the gender wokesters demand that straights must consider mentally ill role-players as their life partners! Lol. The day the gender cult starts berating straight men for not dating transvestites with lady-dicks is the day this whole assault on reality comes crashing down.

In the meantime I'll stick with the oldspeak meaning of 'bisexual' and the knowledge that 2+2=4. And wonder if there's mileage in creating a LGB dating app to purposefully exclude all transfolk so those of us who are 'cissexually-minded' can live our lives in peace and only date people we actually fancy...

[–]LasagnaRossa[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are straights allowed to keep 'heterosexual' to mean the opposite sex or are the wokescolds now redefining that for them too?

As long as I know, they think heterosexual people are attracted by trans people too, as long as they are of the opposite gender (lol). But they don't harass the straight community since they know they are outnumbered and straights won't drink their kool aid.