Twitter and hipocrisy, about pro-Taliban accounts

submitted by ZveroboyAlina from (self.GenderCritical)

I've been told few times that "most islamic countries and people are supporting women's rights", yet for some reason this:

https://twitter.com/Elizrael/status/1428052466944389123 ( https://i.imgur.com/Sa4R3hD.png )

causes an "uproar" in Muslim world, but how Taliban denied all rights for women, raped and forcibly married "non-muslim" women - not caused an "uproar" in Muslim word. Why? If they are against such behaviour, why they were silent?

Also, pro-Taliban and official Taliban accounts are still there, but lesbians are banned for saying they don't want to have sex with penises, women getting banned for saying that biological sex is real. And Twitter can ban politicians - they have banned Trump, for example. Is Twitter okay with misogyny and violence from Taliban, but "lesbians being homosexual" is "too much"?

all 12 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

most islamic countries and people are supporting women's rights

What delusional nutcases are claiming this?

Is Twitter okay with misogyny and violence from Taliban, but "lesbians being homosexual" is "too much"?

Twitter just doesn't give a shit until it affects men. Lesbians asserting boundaries affects men, Taliban being misogynistic does not affect men.

[–]AugustiJade 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Check out BBC News' recent videos on YouTube. The comments will really concern you.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't understand why people are so in a rush to defend muslim men. They are the majority group in their countries, they are the oppressor class. Why are they being defended? Who do these people think are oppressing the women?

[–]lefterfield 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Blind guilt. Too many people are convinced that any "non-white" person is automatically oppressed. The reality, of course, is contextual. A lot of people never travel, they never see the way Muslim or African or Chinese or <insert any other group of men> treat women, children, and foreigners in their country.

[–]Chunkeeguy 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Jews. It's the Jews. Always the Jews.

[–]Finnegan7921 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you can't say shit when they are resettled en masse in western countries. Not being able to say shit about them without being labeled a hateful bigot has resulted in the shitshow that is Wester Europe. No go zones, mass rapes, grooming gangs, etc.

[–]xandit 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Saw an a Muslim in uk in a protest saying their god created men (to worship him or something) and then created women for men. So if they think that in the uk you can imagine what they think elsewhere, and that doesn’t bode well for women’s rights.

[–]Cass 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

About the muslim world. Muslims worship Muhammad as the perfect human being. The ideal. He married a 6yo girl. He had full sex with her when she was 9. They did other sexual stuff before that. Now that you know this, why would they be upset women are forced to marry?

As for twitter, they want to be tolerant and inclusive. Being tolerant nowadays is a benchmark for how good of a person you are.

Saying you don't want to have sex with this or that person or that you exclude someone from your group, even if you have good reasons, that's not tolerant.

I don't agree with it and I want things to change. But if you try to look at things from a perspective of "how can I be the most tolerant and inclusive here" then it makes sense.

[–]lefterfield 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

But if you try to look at things from a perspective of "how can I be the most tolerant and inclusive here" then it makes sense.

It actually doesn't. They are intolerant of lesbians who don't want penises, exclude people who discuss biological sex or have conservative viewpoints. The misogyny they allow excludes women who are victimized by it.

One of the most brilliant acts of political propaganda has been to define "left-wing(not "liberal") values as being "tolerant" and "inclusive". But plenty of people and ideas are excluded from their ideology, which makes them intolerant. TRUE liberalism would be to allow people to express genuinely different viewpoints, debate them openly, and allow people to choose which are the best. As an ideal, at least, in practice there are always limits.

But even considering that limits will always exist, the current illiberal left are among the least tolerant and least inclusive people I've ever met. Twitter supports that crowd, not the ideals of fairness or mutual respect.

[–]Cass 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Saying you don't want to have sex with this or that person or that you exclude someone from your group, even if you have good reasons, that's not tolerant.

This is how they see things. These things are not tolerant/inclusive, according to their definition of tolerance.

Since tolerance = good/moral and intolerance/bigotry = bad/evil (according to the msm/woksters etc) then suppressing the bad/evil people is a good thing in accordance with their ideology.

[–]lefterfield 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, I know how they see it. I'm saying the truth is not in accordance with their views. They aren't tolerant or inclusive, so their moral view is contradictory - or, by their own definitions, they aren't moral people. It can be difficult to define what objective morality is(though I believe it exists), but at the very least, an ideology should be internally consistent. Wokeness is not.

[–]puzzleskulls 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not surprised, not one bit.

The SJW stance is inherently anti-western. Their activities are motivated and actuated by their hatred of the values underpinning Western Civilization. Driven by their hatred, the SJW's main objective is nothing less than the complete subversion of the Western socio-political system.

The evidence of their anti-western sentiment is not immediately obvious. To conceal their true motives, those on the left have consistently claimed that their agendas are inspired by equality, love, and compassion. Many well-meaning people either believe such claims or at least give them the benefit of the doubt. They fail to recognize the corrosive effect on their lives until it is too late.

That's when you get an Adolf Hitler rising to power with promises to restore society to its former glory. I think we're all quite familiar with how he treated people that didn't meet his exacting standards. I don't want to live in Stalin's Russia, or Hitler's Germany. I want to live in the free world my grandfather and great grandfather fought for me to have.

If the SJW's despise free speech and love the Taliban so much, perhaps they should consider relocating. There are many governments the world over that would love to give them a taste of true oppression.