you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]linda_senora 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I think it is perfectly valid (how I have come to hate that word) that some GCs decide to work with conservatives.

The issue is that many GCs think conservatives are also after women's rights.

For instance, I just recently learned of the existence of a man called Matt Walsh. I agree with what he has to say about the gender war, but everything else he has to say about women's rights is questionable. However, I see the need for people like him and for other men to speak up.

I also see why some GCs don't want anything to do with people like him because it might give credence to TRAs who claim radical feminists are far right.

I guess it is a matter of 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend' type of scenario. Too much is at stake.

[–]BEB[S] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Trans Demands Activists are a bunch of loons whose more and more outrageous claims are (thankfully) turning the general public against them. I don't pay them any mind.

Feminists are allying with conservatives for just a few strategic reasons, to stop the Equality Act and similar legislation, would be the immediate goal, but also to protect children, free speech, parents' rights - after that we can go back to opposing whatever we disagree on.

Believe it or not, American politicians used to work across the aisle. I think it's time to bring those days back.

[–]linda_senora 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

TRAs are loons, I fully agree with that statement.

I do think it necessary to work with the other side (conservatives) in order to hinder the assault carried out by the Trans lobby. TRAs and handmaidens are too dangerous.