you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]censorshipment 5 insightful - 8 fun5 insightful - 7 fun6 insightful - 8 fun -  (4 children)

And many of you would be okay with this as long as he didn't identify as a woman. SMFH no one should legally be able to do any of this shit!

[–]copenseethe 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Legislating a fashion choice would violate the 1stA. If the question is whether or not a man that declares himself to be a female should be allowed to compete in women's sports leagues or enter sex segregated spaces, then it is another issue.

[–]WildApples 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. And let's not forget that women used to be accused of cross-dressing when they opted for pants and more comfortable forms of dress. There was serious opposition to letting women choose for themselves how to dress. Women were subjected to arrests and physical violence for dressing like men by wearing pants.

In some parts of the world, women's dress is still highly regulated. If we give society more control over people's clothing choices, it could quickly be turned against us women again.

[–]censorshipment 2 insightful - 6 fun2 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 6 fun -  (1 child)

Not "fashion choice". There's clearly a difference. We know and feel it when we see it.

[–]adungitit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are claiming this stuff should be outlawed, regardless of who's doing it and for what reason. Sit down and think about what you're saying.