you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]itsnotaboutewe 20 insightful - 1 fun20 insightful - 0 fun21 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's happening because nobody is organising against it. There is an obvious organised push for this to happen or they wouldn't have bothered doing it in the first place. It may be difficult to get people who are against it to put their names on a petition but an anonymous survey which asks users whether they are for or against these changes and asks for comments would give those in charge an idea of how popular or otherwise this current configuration is.

[–]ElectricSheep 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It also seems to me that the majority of trans are man-to-woman, not the other way around, so of course they want special uwu bathrooms for "women" and not men. Also, it's more of a stretch to leave urinals and call it "for everyone," so the unfortunate reality is that it's easier to do it this way. However what I've seen in other older conversions is that floor 1 has mens, 2 has womens, and both have a single "everyone" toilet. It's not excellent, but it's better than totally removing women's bathrooms.

edit: I've also noticed that bathrooms being built explicitly for "everyone" have massive amounts of unused space. What's up with this?

[–]lefterfield 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are they built to accommodate wheelchairs, maybe?

[–]ElectricSheep 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I would make a disabled joke but I don't want to get banned