you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]yousaythosethings 30 insightful - 1 fun30 insightful - 0 fun31 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Zucker is right. This is a disturbing social experiment on children that will be likely to most severely impact autistic kids, proto-LGB kids, GNC kids of any kind really, and those who come from troubled homes.

In “Irreversible Damage,” or at least in the press surrounding it, Abigail Shrier shared that the behavior of schools shocked her the most. How school administrators actively and unapologetically undermined parent-child relationships because they were so high on their own sense of moral superiority. They pre-determined that parents were enemies and unsafe actors.

Those TQ videos for kids are also absolutely disturbing and nonsensical. Among the creepiest shit on YouTube.

[–]Femaleisnthateful[S] 26 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 0 fun27 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Seriously. The first 30 seconds of that video embedded in the link was, I thought, pretty progressive... boys and girls can dress however they want, have long or short hair, etc. Cool. Then it turned into an incoherent jumble of trying to avoid discussing the physical reality of male and female bodies. What does it mean to be male or female? We never find out. How to figure out if someone is male or female? Ask them their pronouns. Sounds like grooming, but OK.

[–]yousaythosethings 26 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 0 fun27 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yea like how is actual sex education going to happen if there’s no PC way to differentiate between those who can impregnate and those who can get pregnant? What are they going to do, tell students to check whether they have a front hole or not?

[–]SweetBabyCheeses 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A front hole? Regardless of whether you’re male or female I really hope that’s only for peeing.