all 4 comments

[–]MarkTwainiac 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Social scientists have to stop pretending that poorly-written, bias-laden, anonymous internet questionnaires like this constitute "research." Even if well-written and without bias, these types of surveys do not and cannot produce results that are in any way meaningful.

[–]PinkDonut[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know! Conflating "non-binary" and "GNC" people? Definitely not the same thing. I like that there are at least fields where you can write in exactly what you think.

The results certainly won't be meaningful, but they'll be touted as such in circles high on gender kool-aid and low on science. So at the very least, I hope their gender bubble will deflate slightly if they receive a significant amount of GC responses.

[–]PinkDonut[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

In conjunction with the Questrom School of Business at Boston University, we are currently conducting a study to develop new best practices for asking assessment questions about gender and sexual identity. We need your help to support diversity and inclusion in research and HR practice.

This isn't my survey. It was shared on reddit, exclusively in pro-gender subreddits like r/aromantic and r/actuallesbians and the person who shared it seems dismayed at the idea of GC people filling it out. So, naturally... I shared it here. :)

I don't have an Ovarit account or I'd share it there also. Maybe someone else could? GC Twitter too.

[–]FlickingMarvellous 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It’s already been posted on Ovarit.