Humiliation for Stephanie Hayden: A judge forces Hayden to drop their case

submitted by [deleted] from grahamlinehan.substack.com

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Omina_Sentenziosa 21 insightful - 11 fun21 insightful - 10 fun22 insightful - 11 fun -  (0 children)

Adrian was bemused that Hayden, who identifies as a lawyer

That made me laugh way too much! 🤣🤣🤣

[–]Killer_Danish 19 insightful - 6 fun19 insightful - 5 fun20 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

As Adrian explained to me, Hayden’s problem is two-fold: arrogance and lack of knowledge. Hayden simply fails to understand basic, fundamental and foundational concepts like legal privilege but is too arrogant to accept this when it is pointed out by someone who does. Adrian pointed-out Hayden’s aggressive, pompous tone hides the fact that Hayden has a very narrow knowledge of legal practice, and lacks the formal training that solicitors and barristers have. He said at times, he almost felt sorry for Hayden because he could see the judge was bemused and irritated at Hayden making submissions which were damaging Hayden’s case and credibility – such as raising allegations of fraud which Adrian had already stated he did not intend to speak to, but about which the judge, now given the opportunity by Hayden, grilled Hayden over, causing Hayden to make a statement which Hayden, said Adrian, “may yet come to regret making”.

How very male. Burst in with nary a lick of knowledge for the situation at hand, substituting instead a giant fucking ego and an unjustifiable amount of self-confidence... And he lost! Who didn't see that coming?

[–]AugustiJade 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's a very big bloke.

[–]marmorsymphata 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He also pointed out some of the posts were made at times when Adrian could not have made them (such as when he was sleeping, or in court addressing another High Court judge).

lmao

[–]MarkTwainiac 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In order to experience humiliation, a person needs to have the capacity to feel shame. And feeling shame requires an ability to believe that you yourself are in the wrong, or you've behaved badly - in other words, that sometimes the real problem might be you, not others or the world at large.

Seems to me that like most TRAs, big Steph is pretty shameless.

Hayden's total inability to be self-critical and to consider for one moment that he might sometimes be at fault blinds him to the fact that the source of Hayden's misery that makes him so full of bile and animus is Hayden's own self - not the big bad transphobic world at large or all the individuals he's constantly trying to batter with lawsuits and sports equipment, such as Glinner, Scottow, Farrow, the guy Hayden assaulted with the golf club, Hayden's former boyfriend, the former clients of his who say he ran off with their money, just to name a few.

[–]LoveNotPorn 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

He should be jailed for wasting the courts time.

[–]redditbegay 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a great read of sheud, lasses, here are a few standouts, if you're short on time, but id reccomend a full read! haha.

The two Applications were heard on 30 July, and Hayden made submissions for over five hours. Hayden stated [The Lawyer] was clearly behind the posts on [this website] because some were written by someone who quoted themselves as saying they “were a lawyer”,

“The judge apparently interjected at this point, stated he had read the leaked [lawyer's whatsapp] in its entirety, and contrary to Hayden’s position and he did not think the claim of "Harassment" would succeed at trial.

Hayden had not understood the need to explain why Adrian’s rights under the Human Rights Act should be infringed. Adrian also showed the judge that none of the other things Hayden had accused Adrian of could be harassment, as they were perfectly lawful, legitimate and reasonable

It gets better, ladies...

The judge bluntly told Hayden he would have to provide further evidence before trial on the WhatsApp conversation or the judge would rule definitively that it was and would strike-out the whole claim before the matter came to trial.

Hayden was seeking to use the law to silence Adrian, whilst using social media to repeatedly target Adrian for what Adrian says is abuse and harassment. -The Judge said this part, lol.

Near the ending of the legal finding...

Hayden’s Particulars of Claim and evidence were struck out and the Application for an injunction against Adrian was refused. Hayden was ordered to pay Adrian’s costs of defending the injunction Application. Hayden was also ordered to redraft the Particulars of Claim

And now the piece de resistance:

The court gave Hayden a further 14 days to file new Particulars, or the claim would be struck-out automatically. Just four hours before the claim would have been struck-out, Hayden wrote to the court discontinuing the claim, accepting liability for all of Adrian’s costs.

Bwa Ha Ha. I suggest reading the entire post, though, everyone ;D

[–]PassionateIntensity 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That lunatic should be behind bars. He will never stop.